You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 21 No. 5, November 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Structure and Function of Inhibitory Neuronal Mechanisms: Proceedings of the Fourth International Meeting of Neurobiologists.

Edited by C. von Euler, S. Skoglund, and U. Soderbert. Price, not given. Pp 563. Pergamon Press, Headington Hill Hall, Oxford, England, 1968.

Harry Grundfest, PhD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1969;21(5):558.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Inhibition was discovered in the heart about 125 years ago by the brothers Weber. It was described in the frog central nervous system nearly 100 years ago by Sechenov and by Pavlov in invertebrate muscle. Nevertheless, inhibition became almost a dirty word among physiologists of the first half of the 20th Century. As late as 1955 a leading textbook said that "inhibition is a term of convenience, used without exact definition." The index of the 1939 Symposium on the Synapse carried only one reference and that to "Wedensky inhibition." Likewise, only one reference is to be found in the index of the 1953 Symposium on Brain Mechanisms. In contrast, nearly every speaker at the 1957 Symposium on Reticular Formation in Detroit discussed aspects of inhibition. I noted this change in my own discussion and suggested that the index of that volume would list the many references. Curiously, and perhaps as . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.