You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 21 No. 3, September 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Stimulus Indicators of Summated Human {lambda}-Responses

Donald F. Scott, MD; Reginald G. Bickford, MB, ChB

Arch Neurol. 1969;21(3):277-284.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE PRESENT study was part of a series of investigations into the human electroencephalographic response to visual patterns and "pattern sensitivity" at this laboratory1,2; in particular, the investigations are concerned with {lambda}-waves,3 which occur as a response to scanning of patterned visual fields in the electroencephalograms of normal human subjects and which also have been found in many varieties of animals.4

Rémond and associates5 first investigated {lambda}-waves, using a computer-averaging technique. They called the response obtained the "lambda complex." In the parieto-occipital region, it consisted of four main components. The first was negative (N1), followed by a positive wave (P1), and then by a negative (N2) and a positive deflection (P2). In the present investigation, briefly reported6 previously, a slightly different technique, using the Computer of Average Transients (CAT), was employed. The method was based on the observation7,8 that each . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn

From the Section of Electroencephalography, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation (Dr. Bickford), and Mayo Graduate School of Medicine (University of Minnesota) (Dr. Scott), Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 3, 1969; accepted April 17.

Reprint requests to the Section of Publications, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55901.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.