You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 21 No. 2, August 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pain, Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects.

By H. Merskey, MA, DM, DPM, and F. G. Spear, MD, DPM. Price $8.50. Pp 223. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1967.

M. H. CHARLTON, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1969;21(2):227.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

After a misleadingly dull introduction on history and semantics, the authors provide a clear and interesting summary of current psychiatric thinking on the subject of pain as a clinical problem.

The interest of this book for the neurologist is twofold. In the first place, it provides a general view of the psychological factors which are thought to operate in the patient with a complaint of pain. While the authors pay due tribute to various psychoanalytic theories, they also report on the effects of social background and intellectual level, as well as summarizing the beliefs of ethologists and experimenters. The reader will gain an appreciation of the progress which has come from the eclecticism of modern psychiatry.

Secondly, the neurologist will find here useful summaries of some specific entities, eg, atypical facial pain, the phantom limb,

and "congenital indifference to pain." There are a few disappointing omissions, eg, postherpetic neuralgia. The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.