You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 20 No. 5, May 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Infantile Cerebral Paralysis.

By Sigmund Freud, MD. Translated by Lester A. Russin, MD. Price, $15. Pp 384. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Fla, 1968.

Niels L. Low, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1969;20(5):563-564.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sigmund Freud's Infantile Cerebral Paralysis, one of Freud's least known books, was written over 70 years ago, and the translator and the publishers deserve great praise for having made this edition in the English language possible. The translation is excellent, and the minor adjustments in format from the original German text have enhanced the readability.

It is amazing to see the insight and understanding Freud had in 1897 considering the complexity of the subject. Many of his observations and descriptions are still valid today and have been improved upon but slightly. How correct today is his sentence: "Infantile cerebral palsy is merely a contrived term of our nosographic classification, a label referring to a group of pathological cases!" When classifying cerebral palsy at this time, the word diplegia is somewhat confusing, but Freud's text gives the history of this term, and one understands the classification better.

Freud did not use . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.