You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 20 No. 4, April 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Man

I. A Study of the Xenon 133 Washout Method

E. James Potchen, MD; David O. Davis, MD; Thomas Wharton, BS; Rex Hill, MS; Juan M. Taveras, MD

Arch Neurol. 1969;20(4):378-383.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE CLINICAL determination of the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), based upon the inert gas washout technique of Kety and Schmidt1 and developed by Lassen, Ingvar, Hø-Rasmussen et al2-5 has become an established procedure in many laboratories. This technique is currently advocated as the most physiologic means to measure regional blood flow and, therefore, is assuming increasing importance as an adjunct to carotid arteriography.

Using a two compartment model, many investigators have calculated the washout curve as the sum of two exponents which has been said to estimate regional flow distribution between the white and gray matter, while others have used Zierler's6 mean {lambda}H flow calculations (f= A, where {lambda} = the partition coefficient, H = the difference in height of the curve from 0-10 minutes, and A = the area under the curve). Both of these calculations require knowledge of the maximum height of the curve (Hmax). We . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

St. Louis

From the Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (Drs. Potchen and Davis, and Mr. Wharton) and the Biomedical Computer Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine (Drs. Hill and Taveras) St Louis.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Oct 2, 1968; accepted Nov 25.

Reprint requests to Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, 510 S Kingshighway, St. Louis 63110 (Dr. Potchen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.