You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 2 No. 4, April 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Some Effects of Subcortical Stimulation on the Bar Press Response

JOHN R. KNOTT, Ph.D.; W. R. INGRAM, Ph.D.; ROBERT E. CORRELL, Ph.D.

AMA Arch Neurol. 1960;2(4):476-484.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The effects of subcortical electrical stimulation on electroencephalographic activity, physiologic reactions, and spontaneous behavior of animals have received considerable attention. In 1949 Moruzzi and Magoun13 reported that stimulation of the reticular formation of the brain stem produced a low-voltage fast electroencephalogram, characteristic of the alert state. These effects might be mediated in part by the diffuse projection system of Jasper.8 Ingram, Knott, and Chiles7 showed that, in the unanesthetized animal, stimulation of the reticular system would evoke behavioral, as well as electrical, alerting.

Hess4,5 has studied at length the effects of diencephalic stimulation on the spontaneous behavior of the unanesthetized animal and obtained a variety of responses, both autonomic and somatic in nature. Using anesthetized cats, Kaada10 elicited both autonomic and somatic responses from stimulation of rhinencephalic structures, but failed to evoke any autonomic reactions from stimulation of the hippocampus. MacLean and Delgado11 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Iowa City

Departments of Anatomy and Psychiatry, State University of Iowa School of Medicine.

Present address (Dr. Correll): Neurophysiology Laboratory, Hartford Hospital, Hartford 2, Conn.


Footnotes

Received for publication Aug. 7, 1959.

This study was supported by U. S. Public Health Service, Grant No. M 675 and continuations.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.