You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 19 No. 4, October 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Auditory Evoked Responses

Intracranial and Extracranial Average Evoked Responses

Gastone G. Celesia, MD

Arch Neurol. 1968;19(4):430-437.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

RECENT studies of Kelly et al1 and Celesia et al2,3 have shown that it is possible to identify human somatosensory and auditory cortical areas by recording average evoked potentials obtained by monopolar recordings. However, these studies also pointed out the difficulties in recognizing between responses generated under the recording electrode and responses recorded by volume conduction from distant generators. Kelly et al1 emphasized the need to demonstrate polarity reversal to assign significance to monopolar evoked responses. Nevertheless, sensory average evoked potentials obtained directly from their source may prove to be sufficiently specific in their morphology that a set of criteria could be established for their identification and separation from volume conducted events. To test this possibility, a systematic investigation of auditory average evoked responses has been carried out in cats.

The same technique of computer averaging has been extensively applied in recent years to the study . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Madison, Wis

From the Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin Medical Center, and the Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, Wis.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 22, 1968; accepted June 7.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, VA Hospital, 2500 Overlook Terrace, Madison, Wis 53705 (Dr. Celesia).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1968 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.