You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 19 No. 3, September 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Brain Edema: Proceedings of the Symposium, Sept 11-13, 1965, Vienna.

Edited by Igor Klatzo and Franz Seitelberger. Price, $28.50. Pp 700. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967.

Robert A. Fishman, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1968;19(3):349-350.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This volume is the product of a three-day symposium held in Vienna in September 1965, which dealt with experimental and clinical aspects of brain edema. Many of the presentations dealt with various experimental models of edema, electron microscopic findings, fluid compartments, transport mechanisms, and the "barriers" of the nervous system.

The editors have compiled some 48 papers of various lengths, interspersed with informal discussions by the participants, about one half of whom were from the United States. Most of the papers had been published in detail prior to the meeting or have been since then. It is particularly interesting to read several of the European papers which have not been published previously in English. The volume is uneven; some of the papers are critical summaries by established workers, others are brief "potboilers" of limited value. The recorded informal discussions provide useful critiques of some of the papers. It is . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1968 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.