You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 18 No. 2, February 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Central Control of the Pineal Gland: Visual Pathways

Robert Y. Moore, MD; Alfred Heller, MD; Ranbir K. Bhatnager, BVSc; Richard J. Wurtman, MD; Julius Axelrod, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1968;18(2):208-218.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

UNDER 1 normal lighting conditions the rat pineal gland exhibits a diurnal variation in its content of the amines serotonin1 and norepinephrine2 and the enzyme hydroxyindole-O-methyl transferase (HIOMT).3 Each of these rhythms is affected by changes in environmental lighting. The norepinephrine and HIOMT rhythms appear to be predominantly under photic control and are suppressed in animals kept in continuous light or darkness and in blinded animals.3,4 The serotonin rhythm, in contrast, is eliminated when animals are placed in constant light but persists in animals deprived of visual stimulation.1 Each of the rhythms is maintained by neural information transmitted to the pineal from the central nervous system by the cervical sympathetics. Denervation of the pineal by superior cervical ganglionectomy abolishes all of the rhythms.2-4 In addition, destroying these nerves in the female rat suppresses the vaginal estrus response to continuous environmental illumination, a response . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Chicago; Cambridge, Mass; Bethesda, Md

From the departments of pediatrics, anatomy, medicine (neurology), and pharmacology, University of Chicago (Drs. Moore, Heller, and Bhatnager); the Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (Dr. Wurtman); and the Laboratory of Clinical Science, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr. Axelrod).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 28, 1967; accepted Sept 11.

Reprint requests to Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, 950 E 59th Street, Chicago 60637 (Dr. Moore).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1968 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.