You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 17 No. 3, September 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Steroids and Blood Brain Barrier Alterations in Sodium Acetrizoate Injury

A. Basil Harris, MD

Arch Neurol. 1967;17(3):282-297.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Steroids )TEROIDS have been widely used to ameliorate the effects of various kinds of cerebral injury. In experimentally induced injury some investigators indicate that steroids are beneficial,1-7 while others believe them to be without protective value.8-11 In cats with lengthy exposure of the brain to air, Prados1 attributed protection against swelling, electroencephalographic alterations, and increased capillary permeability (trypan blue) to the administration of extracts of anterior pituitary or of adrenal cortex. Grenell2 repeated the brain exposure experiments in a variety of species and concluded that adrenal cortical extracts prevented structural and functional changes in cerebral cortex.

Blinderman et al3 produced cerebral injury in dogs by the intracarotid injection of vegetable oil. Four of his eight animals treated with methylprednisolone sodium succinate (Solu-Medrol) developed no edema, two did develop it, and two showed equivocal results. The positive effects in the latter four could have been due . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

St. Louis

From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, and the Beaumont-May Institute of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug 15, 1966; accepted Dec 23.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid, St. Louis 63110 (Dr. Harris).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.