This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (40)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Aaron Smith, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1967;17(1):78-80.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MANY CURRENT neurological texts continue to recommend the inclusion of the serial sevens test (counting backward from 100 in sevens) in neurologic examinations of the mental function of patients with suspected or confirmed brain lesions. Hayman¹ (1942) administered this test to 580 adult psychiatric patients and concluded that it was a quick and reasonably accurate test for assessing intellectual efficiency or deterioration in patients with psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Hayman also compared patterns of errors of the adult psychiatric patients with errors of 433 normal male and female school children between the ages of 8 and 15 years, and he described four identical patterns of errors in the two populations. However, the origins, rationale, and validity of this now conventional neurological test have rarely been reviewed.

In 1966, Luria^2,3 described serial sevens as an important neurologic diagnostic aid in many cases because

This test makes particularly high . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Omaha

From the Division of Neurology, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha. Dr. Smith is now at the Neuropsychological Speech Clinic, University of Michigan.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Jan 10, 1967; accepted Feb 15.

Reprint requests to 1111 E Catherine St, Ann Arbor, Mich 48104 (Dr. Smith).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?