You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 16 No. 6, June 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (171)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Electrodiagnostic Aspects of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Juergen E. Thomas, MD; Edward H. Lambert, MD; Kalman A. Cseuz, MD

Arch Neurol. 1967;16(6):635-641.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

RECENTLY, we have conducted a clinical study1 on several hundred patients who had undergone surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Our aim was to establish whether on long-term follow-up the highly satisfying, immediate results of surgery persisted, and to determine what factors were useful in predicting postoperative outcome. The present report describes the results of the preoperative electromyographic examinations and their relationship to the clinical symptomatology and the postoperative prognosis.

Material and Method

Included in this study were all consecutive cases seen at the Mayo Clinic between 1956 and 1963 in which there was (1) a final diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, (2) an electromyographic examination, and (3) surgical decompression of the median nerve., The number of patients fulfilling these criteria totaled 430. Of these, 117 did not complete or did not return a follow-up questionnaire or were deceased. Thirteen additional patients were rejected because they had . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn

From the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Section of Neurology and of Physiology, Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Jan 5, 1967; accepted Jan 23, 1967.

Reprint requests to 200 First St SW, Rochester, Minn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.