You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 16 No. 1, January 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Brain and Conscious Experience.

Edited by John C. Eccles. Price, $16.80. Pp 591. Cloth. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., 175 5th Ave, New York, 1966.

Fred A. Mettler, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1967;16(1):110-111.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is an elegant effort on the part of some notable personages to elucidate a problem of perennial speculation. Eccles' (synapses, conscious experience, and memory) associates in the enterprise were Colonnier and Anderson (neocortical structure), Mountcastle (replication of sensory events), Granit (perception), Creutzfeldt (vision), Libet and Bremer (stimulation of the brain and consciousness), Teuber (trauma), Penfield (speech), Adrian, Jasper, and Gomes (consciousness), Sperry (callosal section), Moruzzi (sleep), Phillips and MacKay (motor function), Thorpe (comparative psychology), Heymans and de Schaepdryver (dopamine), and Schaefer (psychosomatics). The book is cast in the format of regular presentations which are followed by discussions. Since, from the fore-going, it is apparent that there was a good deal of overlapping in the presentations, it is interesting to observe how isolated the position of each individual could be as a consequence of preoccupation with individual interests and research techniques. Eccles' prefatory comments are somewhat disturbing. He tells us . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.