You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 15 No. 1, July 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is the Brain "An Immunologically Privileged Site?"

III. Studies Based on Homologous Skin Grafts to the Brain and Subcutaneous Tissues *

LABE C. SCHEINBERG, MD; D. G. KOTSILIMBAS, MD; R. KARPF, AB; N. MAYER, AB

Arch Neurol. 1966;15(1):62-67.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE CONCEPT of the brain as "an immunologically privileged site" has come about as a result of the investigations of Medawar1 and Greene.2-4 Medawar1 showed that the brain does not respond with the typical "primary or secondary set reaction" histologically when homologous skin is implanted in the cerebrum. Greene2-4 demonstrated that the brain will accept tumor homotransplants or heterotransplants which were rejected when transplanted to other sites under ordinary circumstances. These phenomena and the failure to demonstrate lymphatic channels in the brain have led to the concept that the brain is "an immunologically privileged site."

Scheinberg et al5,6 have subsequently demonstrated that this "immunologic privilege of the brain" appears to be far from perfect. In their initial studies5 they demonstrated a variable acceptance of tumor homotransplants by the brain with rejection of all tumor homotransplants by the subcutaneous tissues. Tumor isotransplants were almost . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

From the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology and the Department of Neurological Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, New York.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication March 25, 1966; accepted April 11.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York 10461 (Dr. Scheinberg).

Part I, "Studies Based on Intracerebral Tumor Homotransplantation and Isotransplantation to Sensitized Hosts" may be found in the September 1964 issue of the Archives, pp 248-264; part II, "Studies in Induced Host Resistance to Transplantable Mouse Glioma Following Irradiation of Prior Implants" in September 1965, pp 283-286.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.