You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 15 No. 1, July 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Nature of Psychology.

By Kenneth W. Craik. Edited by Stephen L. Sherwood. Price, $6. Pp 184. Cambridge University Press, 32 E 57 St, New York, 1966.

David A. Freedman, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1966;15(1):110-111.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Kenneth W. Craik was one of the group of experimenters and theoreticians whose work during World War II, largely directed toward the solution of military problems, has since become incorporated into the conventional thinking of the behavioral sciences. The victim of a cycling accident less than 24 hours before V. E. Day, Craik's name and work have been unfamiliar to those, like the present reviewer, who are only peripherally concerned with cybernetics. Yet, McCulloch, Verbeek, and Sherwood say of him in their introduction, "... Craik engendered most of those notions which the last twenty years have elaborated...." Else-where, Grey Walter refers to his death as "... one of the greatest losses Cambridge University has suffered...." The present volume includes his PhD thesis, an unfinished monograph on the "Mechanism of Human Action," some observations on his own monocular solar scotoma, and a variety of notes and memoranda. It would require a critic much . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.