You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 14 No. 5, May 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (151)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Trigeminal, Facial, Vagal, and Glossopharyngeal Nerves in the Monkey

Afferent Connections

ALBERT L. RHOTON, JR., MD; JAMES L. O'LEARY, MD; J. PAUL FERGUSON, MD

Arch Neurol. 1966;14(5):530-540.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

STUDIES of the central connections of the afferents of cranial nerves V, VII, IX, and X in man and other primates have yet to yield the detailed knowledge which has developed for the lower mammalian brain stem. This is not only due to the limited histologic opportunity which human material permits but also to dependence of most primate studies on the Marchi method which is unreliable for tracing the course of nonmyelinated fibers. This study was undertaken in the monkey with the hope of filling in detail comparable to that now available for the lower vertebrate and lesser mammalian brain stem.

The Nauta-Gygax technique was selected because it demonstrates degenerating nonmyelinated as well as myelinated axons and because it had not been used to trace the entering afferents of VII, IX and X in the monkey. Study of the central connections of cranial V was not a part of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN

From the Beaumont-May Institute of Neurology and the Division of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Dec 30, 1965; accepted Jan 8, 1966.

Reprint requests to Section of Neurologic Surgery, the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55901 (Dr. Rhoton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.