You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 14 No. 2, February 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Stimulus Generalization.

Edited by David I. Mostofsky. Price, $11.50. Pp. 389. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif 94305, 1965.

Frank J. Mandriota, PhD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1966;14(2):228-229.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The empirical concept of stimulus generalization refers to the obvious but highly complex fact that conditioned behavior is displayed to stimuli which have never been presented in conditioning. That stimuli other than the conditioned stimulus will elicit a conditioned response does not require elaborate laboratory demonstration. It is evident when teaching a child vocabulary or when training a dog to fetch. A great deal of laboratory work has been done, however, to specify the phenomenon in detail. This book contains much of that work. As Professor Mostofsky states in his preface, the book is neither a collection of theoretical arguments nor a comprehensive review of the empirical work, it samples both.

Of the 22 papers in the book, nine are primarily conceptual or theoretical and in behavioral terms and eleven primarily report behavioral experiments. Only one paper focuses on the neural basis of stimulus generalization, and it is supported by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.