You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 14 No. 1, January 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optokinetic Nystagmus and Cerebral Disease

Clinical and Pathological Study

ROBERT A. DAVIDOFF, MD; ADAM ATKIN, BS; PAUL J. ANDERSON, MD; MORRIS B. BENDER, MD

Arch Neurol. 1966;14(1):73-81.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

OPTOKINETIC nystagmus (OKN) was introduced as a clinical tool by Barany1 in 1921, but in spite of intensive study and investigation, knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the phenomenon and the anatomic substrates involved in its production is incomplete. An "optokinetic center" has been assumed to exist mainly on the basis of analysis of optokinetic dysfunction in patients with lesions more or less well localized on clinical grounds. This hypothesis, while consistent with classical anatomic conjecture, has not proved fruitful in understanding the phenomenon. Witness the fact that little agreement has been reached regarding the location of the so-called "center."2-5

Although it is generally agreed that disturbances of optokinetic nystagmus are frequent in patients with intracranial pathology, the clinical value of optokinetic testing has been disputed. While some authors have insisted that a unilateral defect in OKN is virtually diagnostic of a parietal lobe lesion,4,6 others have taken . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

From the Department of Neurology and Division of Neuropathology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 28, 1965; accepted Sept 13.

Reprint requests to The Mt. Sinai Hospital, 11 E 100th St, New York, NY 10029 (Dr. Bender).

Almost one half of the patients were also tested at the bedside by means of a standard one-half inch wide tape measure with black inch markings. Since speed and uni-formity of movement could not be controlled, we did not include these data in our results. It should be noted that in general, the nystagmus induced by tape conformed to that induced by the rotating cylinder.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.