You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 13 No. 6, December 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

La Théorie des passions a la lumiére de la pensée médicale du XVIIe siécle.

By W. Riese. Price, not given. Pp 74. Karger AG, S, Arnold-Bröcklin, Strasse 25, Basel, Switzerland, 1965.

M. H. Charlton, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1965;13(6):680.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The two theories of Western philosophy which have had the most influence on the development of psychiatric thought are the dichotomy between mind and body, and the parcellation of mental function into its intellectual and emotional aspects. In this monograph on medical philosophy in the 17th century, Dr. Riese is right to point out the crucial importance of Descartes' attempts to grapple with these problems at a time when philosophy was adjusting itself to the birth of modern science. However, he fails to convey the spirit of pioneering excitement (and painstaking detail) with which Descartes attempted to relate physiologic to psychologic events, and which still strike readers of his "Passions de L'Ame." Unfortunately, Dr. Riese's cursory treatment of Descartes makes his discussion of the 17th century physicians who walked in Descartes' shadow less satisfactory than might have been hoped.

Dr. Riese gives only two pages to John Locke, the only . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.