You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 13 No. 6, December 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Dorsal Rhizotomy Upon Subthalamic Dyskinesia in the Monkey

BENNETT M. STEIN, MD; MALCOLM B. CARPENTER, MD

Arch Neurol. 1965;13(6):567-583.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ONE UNRESOLVED question concerning various forms of dyskinesia is the role that sensory input plays in the underlying basic neural mechanism. Relatively little data are available concerning the effects of dorsal rhizotomies upon human dyskinesia mainly because this procedure would have to be extensive and would result in widespread sensory loss. In the human, dorsal rhizotomy has been performed primarily for relief of pain, visceral crises, and spasticity or rigidity.10,13,15,16,18,33 There are, however, a few instances in which dorsal rhizotomies have been performed upon patients with dyskinesia. According to Frazier,15 surgical section of successive cervical dorsal roots in a patient with infantile diplegia caused spasticity to be diminished and all athetoid movements to disappear. A similar result was reported by Clark and Taylor10 but all spasticity was abolished in this case. Foerster,13 whose extensive experience with dorsal rhizotomy is well known, summarized his views on resection . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

From the Department of Anatomy, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 27, 1965; accepted Sept 13.

Reprint requests to Department of Anatomy, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (Dr. Carpenter).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.