You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 13 No. 1, July 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (79)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Averaged Evoked Somatosensory Responses From Exposed Cortex of Man

DAVID L. KELLY, Jr., MD; SIDNEY GOLDRING, MD; JAMES L. O'LEARY, MD

Arch Neurol. 1965;13(1):1-9.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

RELATIVELY few observations on sensory evoked responses are documented for the cerebral cortex of man.1-3 A major obstacle to acquisition of human records has been the small size of the evoked activities observed at the cortical surface. They are smaller than similar responses seen in animals and therefore more easily obscured by spontaneous rhythms of the electroencephalogram (EEG). Recently digital computers have made it possible to uncover such submerged electrical evocations. The computer is programmed to add the electrical activities—both evoked and spontaneous —that follow each stimulus of a repetitive sequence. The sum of the evoked potentials, which are nonrandom events, increases directly as the number of responses added, while the sum of random EEG waves increase as the square root of the number of samples obtained. Thus the two activities grow at a disproportionate rate, and the evoked response is exposed above the spontaneous background rhythms. The technique . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations



PITTSBURGH

From the departments of neurology and neurosurgery and the Beaumont May Institute of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; Division of Neurosurgery, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, (Dr. Kelly); and the Division of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Dr. Goldring).


Footnotes



Submitted for publication Nov 24, 1964; accepted Dec 18.

Presented in part at the 89th annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, Atlantic City, NJ June 15-17, 1964.

Reprint requests to University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 15213, (Dr. Goldring).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.