You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 12 No. 6, June 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Developmental Dyslexia.

By MacDonald Critchley. Pp 104. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 321-327 E Lawrence Ave, Springfield, Ill 62700, 1964.

M. H. Charlton, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1965;12(6):662.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Reading disability is likely to attract increasing attention from physicians as society demands ever more skill and education from its workers. Dr. Critchley is concerned to extract from the heterogeneous group of retarded readers (which includes children with mental deficiency, diffuse brain damage, and psychiatric difficulties) a select group whose nuclear difficulty lies in reading, and who have been described as suffering from 'specific' or 'developmental' dyslexia. The etiology, and even the very existence, of this syndrome as a separate entity have been strenuously disputed.

While the author is essentially concerned to delineate developmental dyslexia as an autonomous, and neurological, entity, the monograph will have great value for all those interested in reading disability, whether they agree with him or not. For he scrupulously quotes and discusses other theories (eg, linguistic, ophthalmologic, and psychiatric hypotheses), and thus provides an excellent survey of the field beyond the particular point he wishes . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.