You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 3, September 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Post-Tetanic Potentiation of H Reflex in Normal Man

Quantitative Study

WILLIAM STEPHEN CORRIE, BA; WILLIAM B. HARDIN, JR., MD

Arch Neurol. 1964;11(3):317-323.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Hoffmann1 originally suggested that the electrically induced stretch reflex in man is a monosynaptic one. Later Lloyd2 proved in cats that the simple reflex twitch which resulted from muscle nerve stimulation is in fact monosynaptic, and, in 1951, Magladery and others3 confirmed this observation for the H reflex in man.

It soon became evident that even among normal human volunteers there is considerable variation of H reflex amplitude.4,5 Moreover, the reflex in individual subjects varies spontaneously, as well as with changes in muscle length, tonic contraction, the Jendrassik maneuver, and post-tetanic potentiation (PTP). Attempts to correlate H reflexes with specific pathological conditions have met with limited success.6-9 The H reflex is absent, or markedly reduced, when the myotatic reflex is itself absent due to a disorder of the reflex arc. An exception to this rule is spinal shock.10 Significant augmentation of the H . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ST. LOUIS

From the Department of Neurology and the Beaumont-May Institute of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 10, 1964; accepted May 1.

Washington University Student Research Fellow (Mr. Corrie); United States Public Health Service Special Fellow (Dr. Hardin).

Supported in part by grant NB-04513-01, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, United States Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.