You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 1, July 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Injuries of the Spine.

By M. Beckett Howorth, and J. Gordon Petrie. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1964, pp 343.

Frank E. Stinchfield, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1964;11(1):101.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The sometimes complex, frequently confusing, and specialty-overlapping problem of spinal cord and bone injury has been well presented in this volume. The emphasis is on the orthopedic aspect and derives from the co-authors extensive personal experiences and medical practices at the New York Orthopaedic Hospital, the Presbyterian and Roosevelt Hospital, in New York; the Northern Westchester Hospital, the Greenwich Hospital, the Montreal Neurological Institute, and the Royal Victoria Hospital.

The first 60 pages consist of Dr. George Bennett's excellent Presidential Address at the American Orthopaedic Association meeting in 1942 on the history of spinal fractures. The remainder of the book considers spinal trauma regionally with a closing section on neurological dysfunction. About one-third of the book is concerned with cervical spine injuries—and this is the best section for a clear logical therapeutic approach to the wide variety of injuries at this level.

The illustrations throughout are uniformly good but especially . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.