You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 10 No. 5, May 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Studies on the Sensory Innervation (Human Sensibility).

Second edition, 1963 By Hachiro Seto, MD. Price not given. Pp 523, with 537 figures (2 in color). Charles C Thomas Publishers, 301-327 E Lawrence Ave, Springfield, Ill.

H. Grundfest, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1964;10(5):532.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Presumably, Professor Seto did not intend his monograph to be a comprehensive and authoratative account of the fine structure of sensory anatomy, but rather a summary of his personal views based on some 30 years of work in his laboratory. The author is a former student of Stöhr and champions the latter's view of the anastomosis of autonomic nerve fibers in a terminal reticulum. "A terminal reticulum never ends free but always anastomoses with the adjacent reticula, so that every vegetative nerve fibre passes over into a large terminal net-work... the entire vegetative nerve system forms a grad closed net-work pervading the whole body. Histological differentiation between sympathetic fibres and parasympathetic fibres becomes impossible..." (page 9).

Holding these views, Professor Seto finds frequent cause to quarrel with "Langley's neuron theory," by which he presumably means Langley's adoption of the neuron doctrine as developed on anatomical grounds, chiefly by Cajal, and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.