You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 10 No. 4, April 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Symbolic Language of Van Gogh.

By H. R. Graetz. Price, $9.95. Pp 315. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 330 W 42nd St, New York 10036, 1963.

M. H. Charlton, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1964;10(4):431.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the neurologist, discussion of symbolism may seem distressingly remote, since our knowledge of neurophysiology is not yet sufficient to account for much cruder types of perception. How ever, in clinical practice we are required to deal with disturbances of symbol formulation (as in the aphasias and agnosias), and a better understanding of the psychology of symbolism might well lead to an increased discernment of its breakdown in organic disease. In the book under review the author attempts to interpret the paintings of Van Gogh as symbolically representing, both in detail and in general composition, certain aspects of the painter's life, such as his relationship with his brother, and his sense of personal isolation and sexual inadequacy. M. Graetz relies on liberal quotations from Van Gogh's recently published correspondence to support his interpretation of the paintings, of which his book contains numerous (and technically excellent) reproductions.

Interpretations of works of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.