You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 10 No. 2, February 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (65)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fusimotor Function

Part VI. H Reflex, Tendon Jerk, and Reinforcement in Hemiplegia

WILLIAM M. LANDAU, MD; MARGARET H. CLARE, MA

Arch Neurol. 1964;10(2):128-134.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The classic example of a Jacksonian release phenomenon is the increased stretch reflex observed in muscles affected by upper motor neuron damage. In hemiplegia similar stimuli, applied bilaterally, produce an increased muscular reaction on the affected side. It has been generally inferred that this represents an increase of synaptic excitability at the final common path, somehow resulting from the disturbance of impulses normally projected there from the rostral neuraxis.

In 1957 Buller1 proposed a new mechanism based on his study of five cases of early hemiplegia. He compared the maximal tendon jerk in each leg with the maximal electrically evoked response (H reflex) in the same muscles. It is significant that he considered the maximal H reflex to be not the largest evoked by any intensity, but rather the largest response "just short of that [intensity] necessary to produce direct stimulation of the motor fibers."

His reasoning was as . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ST. LOUIS

From the Department of Neurology and the Beaumont-May Institute of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Sept 16, 1963; accepted Oct 17.

Supported in part by US Public Health Service grant NB-04513.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.