You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 1, January 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Multiple Sclerosis/ Demyelinating Disease
 •Neurology, Other
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?


Heterogeneity in Response to Interferon Beta in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

A 3-Year Monthly Imaging Study

Annie W. Chiu, BS; Nancy Richert, MD, PhD; Mary Ehrmantraut, MS; Joan Ohayon, MSN; Shiva Gupta, MD; Giuseppe Bomboi, MD; Deeya Gaindh, AB; Fredric K. Cantor, MD; Joseph A. Frank, MS, MD; Henry F. McFarland, MD; Francesca Bagnato, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(1):39-43. Published online November 10, 2008 (doi:10.1001/archneur.66.1.noc80047).

Objectives  To investigate the heterogeneity in magnetic resonance image (MRI) patterns of response to interferon beta across patients with multiple sclerosis or within an individual patient over time.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Fifteen patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis underwent monthly MRIs and clinical examinations (6-month pretherapy phase and 36-month therapy phase) and bimonthly neutralizing antibody tests. On each MRI, the total number of contrast-enhancing lesions was noted. Therapy MRI responders were defined as those with a reduction of 60% or more in the total number of contrast-enhancing lesions during each semester of therapy.

Intervention  Subcutaneous administration of interferon beta-1b, 250 µg, every other day for 3 years.

Main Outcome Measure  Reduction in the number of contrast-enhancing lesions.

Results  Eight patients (53.3%) were MRI responders and 7 (46.7%) were nonresponders. Of those 7, 3 (20.0%) had only an initial optimal reduction of the total number of contrast-enhancing lesions, 2 (13.3%) never reached an optimal response, and 2 (13.3%) had a delayed optimal response. No clear association between neutralizing antibody profile and MRI response was evident.

Conclusions  Multiple MRI evaluations disclose that approximately only half of the patients treated with interferon beta achieve and maintain a full response to the drug over time, although an additional small number of individuals may still restore an optimal response to the drug after an initial failure.


Author Affiliations: Neuroimmunology Branch (Mss Chiu, Ehrmantraut, Ohayon, and Gaindh and Drs Richert, Gupta, Bomboi, Cantor, McFarland, and Bagnato) and Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology and Research (Dr Frank), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(1):17-18.
FULL TEXT  

Defining Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Response With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: How Much Activity Is Too Much?
Paul S. Giacomini, Douglas L. Arnold, Amit Bar-Or, and Jack P. Antel
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(1):19-20.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Defining Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Response With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: How Much Activity Is Too Much?
Giacomini et al.
Arch Neurol 2009;66:19-20.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.