This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Multiple Sclerosis/ Demyelinating Disease  • Neurology, Other  • Immunologic Disorders  • Alert me on articles by topic

A Descriptive Study of 60 Patients

Jérôme de Seze, MD; Marc Debouverie, MD; Hélène Zephir, MD; Christine Lebrun, MD; Frédéric Blanc, MD; Véronique Bourg, MD; Sandrine Wiertlewski, MD; Sophie Pittion, MD; David Laplaud, MD; Emmanuelle Le Page, MD; Romain Deschamps, MD; Philippe Cabre, MD; Jean Pelletier, MD; Irina Malikova, MD; Pierre Clavelou, MD; Valérie Jaillon, MD; Gilles Defer, MD; Pierre Labauge, MD; Olivier Gout, MD; Clotilde Boulay, MD; Gilles Edan, MD; Patrick Vermersch, MD

Arch Neurol. 2007;64(10):1426-1432.

Background  Acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is characterized by a severe inflammatory attack, frequently secondary to infectious events or vaccinations. To date, no clear criteria exist for ADEM, and the risk of subsequent evolution to multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unknown.

Objective  To evaluate the risk of evolution to MS after a first episode of ADEM.

Design  Observational, retrospective case study.

Setting  Thirteen French MS centers.

Patients  We retrospectively studied 60 patients with ADEM who were older than 15 years with no history suggestive of an inflammatory event who presented to MS centers from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2005. We excluded 6 patients with multiphasic ADEM because this is a rare condition and somewhat difficult to classify. After a mean follow-up of 3.1 years (range, 1-10 years), the remaining 54 patients were then classified into 2 groups: monophasic ADEM (ADEM group) (n = 35) and clinically definite MS (MS group) (n = 19).

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical, laboratory, magnetic resonance imaging, and follow-up data were evaluated for each group.

Results  Patients in the ADEM group more frequently had atypical symptoms of MS (26 of 35 [74%]) than patients with MS (8 of 19 [42%]) (P = .02). Oligoclonal bands were more frequently observed in the MS group (16 of 19 [84%]) than in the ADEM group (7 of 35 [20%]) (P <.001). Patients in the ADEM group more frequently had gray matter involvement (21 of 35 [60%]) than those in the MS group (2 of 19 [11%]) (P <.001). On the basis of these results, we consider that the presence of any 2 of the following 3 criteria could be used to differentiate patients with ADEM from those with MS in our cohort: atypical clinical symptoms for MS, absence of oligoclonal bands, and gray matter involvement. On this basis, 29 of the 35 patients in the ADEM group (83%) and 18 of the 19 patients in the MS group (95%) were classified in the appropriate category.

Conclusions  Our study found some differences concerning the risk of evolution to clinically definite MS after a first demyelinating episode suggestive of ADEM. These findings led us to propose criteria that should now be tested in a larger, prospective cohort study.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Neurology, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg (Drs de Seze and Blanc), University of Nancy, Nancy (Drs Debouverie and Pittion), University of Lille, Lille (Drs Zephir and Vermersch), University of Nice, Nice (Drs Lebrun and Bourg), University of Nantes, Nantes (Drs Wiertlewski and Laplaud), University of Rennes, Rennes (Drs Le Page and Edan), Fondation Rothschild-Paris Hospital, Paris (Drs Deschamps and Gout), Fort de France-Martinique Hospital, Fort de France, Martinique (Dr Cabre), University of Marseille, Marseille (Drs Pelletier and Malikova), University of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand (Dr Clavelou), University of Caen, Caen (Drs Jaillon and Defer), University of Nîmes, Nîmes (Dr Labauge), and Mulhouse Hospital, Mulhouse (Dr Boulay), France.

RELATED LETTERS

Multiple Sclerosis and Recurrent Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Are Different Diseases
Charles M. Poser
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):674.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multiple Sclerosis and Recurrent Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Are Different Diseases—Reply
Jérôme de Seze
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):674-675.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monophasic Acute, Recurrent, and Multiphasic Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis
Vesna V. Brinar and Mario Habek
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):675-676.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monophasic Acute, Recurrent, and Multiphasic Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis—Reply
Jérôme de Seze
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):676.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Diagnosis Between Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis During the First Episode
Eleonora Tavazzi, Sabrina Ravaglia, Diego Franciotta, and Enrico Marchioni
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):676-677.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Diagnosis Between Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis During the First Episode—Reply
Jérôme de Seze
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):677.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach
Miller et al.
Mult Scler 2008;14:1157-1174.
ABSTRACT  

Multiple Sclerosis and Recurrent Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Are Different Diseases
Poser
Arch Neurol 2008;65:674-674.
FULL TEXT  

Monophasic Acute, Recurrent, and Multiphasic Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis
Brinar and Habek
Arch Neurol 2008;65:675-676.
FULL TEXT  

Differential Diagnosis Between Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis During the First Episode
Tavazzi et al.
Arch Neurol 2008;65:676-677.
FULL TEXT  

Differential Diagnosis Between Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis During the First Episode--Reply
de Seze
Arch Neurol 2008;65:677-677.
FULL TEXT