You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 7, July 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pramipexole vs Levodopa as Initial Treatment for Parkinson Disease

A 4-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

The Parkinson Study Group*

Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1044-1053.

Background  The best way to initiate dopaminergic therapy for early Parkinson disease remains unclear.

Objective  To compare initial treatment with pramipexole vs levodopa in early Parkinson disease, followed by levodopa supplementation, with respect to the development of dopaminergic motor complications, other adverse events, and functional and quality-of-life outcomes.

Design  Multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Setting  Academic movement disorders clinics at 22 sites in the United States and Canada.

Patients  Patients with early Parkinson disease (N = 301) who required dopaminergic therapy to treat emerging disability, enrolled between October 1996 and August 1997 and observed until August 2001.

Intervention  Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg of pramipexole 3 times per day with levodopa placebo (n = 151) or 25/100 mg of carbidopa/levodopa 3 times per day with pramipexole placebo (n = 150). Dosage was escalated during the first 10 weeks for patients with ongoing disability. Thereafter, investigators were permitted to add open-label levodopa or other antiparkinsonian medications to treat ongoing or emerging disability.

Main Outcome Measures  Time to the first occurrence of dopaminergic complications: wearing off, dyskinesias, on-off fluctuations, and freezing; changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and quality-of-life scales; and adverse events.

Results  Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of developing dyskinesias (24.5% vs 54%; hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.56; P<.001) and wearing off (47% vs 62.7%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.63; P = .02). Initial levodopa treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of freezing (25.3% vs 37.1%; hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.11-2.59; P = .01). By 48 months, the occurrence of disabling dyskinesias was uncommon and did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The mean improvement in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score from baseline to 48 months was greater in the levodopa group than in the pramipexole group (2 ± 15.4 points vs –3.2 ± 17.3 points, P = .003). Somnolence (36% vs 21%, P = .005) and edema (42% vs 15%, P<.001) were more common in pramipexole-treated subjects than in levodopa-treated subjects. Mean changes in quality-of-life scores did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions  Initial treatment with pramipexole resulted in lower incidences of dyskinesias and wearing off compared with initial treatment with levodopa. Initial treatment with levodopa resulted in lower incidences of freezing, somnolence, and edema and provided for better symptomatic control, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, compared with initial treatment with pramipexole. Both options resulted in similar quality of life. Levodopa and pramipexole both appear to be reasonable options as initial dopaminergic therapy for Parkinson disease, but they are associated with different efficacy and adverse-effect profiles.


*The Writing Group members for the Parkinson Study Group who had complete access to the raw data needed for this report and who bear authorship responsibility for this report are given in the "Author Contributions" at the end of this article. A complete list of the affiliations for the Writing Group appears along with a complete list of the members of the Parkinson Study Group at the end of this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fourteen-year final report of the randomized PDRG-UK trial comparing three initial treatments in PD
Katzenschlager et al.
Neurology 2008;71:474-480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacologic Management of Parkinson Disease: Choice of Initial Therapy in Early Disease
Chen and Pahwa
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2008;21:244-253.
ABSTRACT  

Pharmacologic Options for Treatment of Levodopa-Associated ``Wearing Off''
Waters and Chen
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2008;21:254-261.
ABSTRACT  

Current Management of the Cognitive Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease: How Far Have We Come?
Vale
Exp. Biol. Med. 2008;233:941-951.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A review of Parkinson's disease
Davie
Br Med Bull 2008;86:109-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unregulated Cytosolic Dopamine Causes Neurodegeneration Associated with Oxidative Stress in Mice
Chen et al.
J. Neurosci. 2008;28:425-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Options in the Modern Management of Parkinson Disease
Schapira
Arch Neurol 2007;64:1083-1088.
FULL TEXT  

Risk factors for somnolence, edema, and hallucinations in early Parkinson disease
Biglan et al.
Neurology 2007;69:187-195.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for the Development of Pedal Edema in Patients Using Pramipexole
Kleiner-Fisman and Fisman
Arch Neurol 2007;64:820-824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease: clinical features, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment
Thanvi et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2007;83:384-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A multicentre longitudinal observational study of changes in self reported health status in people with Parkinson's disease left untreated at diagnosis
Grosset et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:465-469.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Implications of Using US-Specific EQ-5D Preference Weights for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Noyes et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:327-334.
ABSTRACT  

Skin rash associated with Sinemet does not equal levodopa allergy
Chou and Stacy
Neurology 2007;68:1078-1079.
FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated With the Development of Motor Fluctuations and Dyskinesias in Parkinson Disease
Hauser et al.
Arch Neurol 2006;63:1756-1760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical trials aimed at detecting neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease
Hauser and Zesiewicz
Neurology 2006;66:S58-S68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Non-linearity of Parkinson's disease progression: implications for sample size calculations in clinical trials
Guimaraes et al.
Clin Trials 2005;2:509-518.
ABSTRACT  

Present and future drug treatment for Parkinson's disease
Schapira
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005;76:1472-1478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Initial Management of Parkinson's Disease
Nutt and Wooten
NEJM 2005;353:1021-1027.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical studies with transdermal rotigotine in early Parkinson's disease
Poewe and Luessi
Neurology 2005;65:S11-S14.
FULL TEXT  

Sleep issues in Parkinson's disease
Adler and Thorpy
Neurology 2005;64:S12-S20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The role of radiotracer imaging in Parkinson disease
Ravina et al.
Neurology 2005;64:208-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dopamine Agonists Modify the Course of Parkinson Disease
Stern
Arch Neurol 2004;61:1969-1971.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.