You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Cognitive Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Differential Cortical Atrophy in Subgroups of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Sandra Bell-McGinty, PhD; Oscar L. Lopez, MD; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer, MD; Joelle M. Scanlon, PhD; Ellen M. Whyte, MD; Steven T. DeKosky, MD; James T. Becker, PhD

Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1393-1397.

ABSTRACT

Objective  To compare gray matter brain volumes in patients diagnosed with subtypes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (those with a focal amnestic disorder and those with more diffuse cognitive dysfunction) with those of elderly controls.

Design  Magnetic resonance imaging volumetric study of MCI subgroups (MCI-amnestic [MCI-A], and MCI-multiple cognitive domain [MCI-MCD]) using a whole brain voxel-based analysis.

Setting  Referral dementia clinic.

Patients  Thirty-seven patients with MCI (age range, 49-85 years; MCI-A, n = 9; MCI-MCD, n = 28) and 47 control subjects (age range, 55-81 years).

Main Outcome Measures  Volumetric anatomical magnetic resonance imaging differences between MCI subgroups and normal controls, and between patients with MCI who progressed to dementia. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed using statistical software SPM99.

Results  Overall, the patients with MCI had significantly decreased volume in the hippocampus and middle temporal gyrus, bilaterally, compared with control subjects. Compared with patients with MCI-MCD, patients with MCI-A had significant volume loss of the left entorhinal cortex and inferior parietal lobe. Compared with patients with MCI-A, patients with MCI-MCD had significantly reduced volume of the right inferior frontal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, and bilateral superior temporal gyrus. Patients with MCI who progressed to Alzheimer disease during follow-up (mean interval 2 years, maximum 4.5 years), showed greater atrophy in the left entorhinal cortex, bilateral superior temporal gyri, and right inferior frontal gyrus compared with those who did not progress.

Conclusions  These data provide evidence of distinct brain structural abnormalities in 2 groups of patients with MCI. While both have mesial temporal and cortical volume loss, those with a focal memory deficit have more involvement of the mesial temporal structures and less involvement of the neocortical heteromodal association areas than those patients with MCI with diffuse cognitive dysfunction. Thus, MCI may represent a more heterogeneous group than currently conceived, possibly reflecting 2 different etiological processes to dementia. These data also suggest that these structural abnormalities precede the development of Alzheimer disease.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The transitional state between normal aging and Alzheimer disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), has become a focus of research owing to the development of effective pharmacotherapy aimed at altering the natural history of the disease.1-2 A number of brain structural abnormalities have been identified among patients with MCI with abnormal memory, including significant reduction in the volume of the hippocampus,3-4 medial occipitotemporal lobe,5 parahippocampal gyrus, entorhinal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, and anterior cingulate gyrus.6-7 These morphological abnormalities are particularly severe among those patients with MCI who progress to AD compared with those who do not.6, 8

Even though MCI diagnosis relies primarily on the presence of memory dysfunction, a growing number of studies have concluded that performance in other cognitive domains is often not entirely normal.1, 9 While some patients exhibit an isolated memory problem, others can have altered neuropsychological test performance in multiple cognitive areas.1, 9 The purpose of this study was to compare regional gray matter brain volumes in 2 subtypes of patients with MCI using a whole brain voxel-based analysis.10 This approach is not biased to a specific brain region and permits identification of potential unsuspected brain structure abnormalities,10 allowing for a more comprehensive description of the differences between MCI subtypes.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients from a group of 200 who met criteria for MCI, as described below, underwent a volumetric spoiled gradient-recalled magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Each patient received an extensive evaluation,11 and was reevaluated on an annual basis with regard to neuropsychiatric status to determine whether there was a change in diagnosis.

Volumetric MRI scans were obtained on 47 older comparison subjects from 3 ongoing studies, including the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (n = 28),11 the University of Pittsburgh’s Mental Health Intervention Research Center for Late-Life Mood Disorders,12 and a study of cognitive and cerebrovascular consequences of hypertension (n = 19).13 None of the controls converted to dementia or MCI within 5 years of the scan.

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION

The neuropsychological evaluation included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE),14 the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale,15 and measures of 4 cognitive domains: memory, language, visuospatial/visuoconstructional, and attention/executive functions. Details of the neuropsychological battery have been described elsewhere.16 The results of the cognitive tests were classified normal or abnormal (>1.5 below that of subjects of comparable age and education) based on normative data obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center normal control sample.

MCI CRITERIA

Patients with MCI-amnestic (MCI-A) (n = 9) required memory deficits, with otherwise normal cognitive function. These patients must have impairments in delayed recall verbal memory, nonverbal memory, or both.16

Patients with MCI-multiple cognitive domain (MCI-MCD) (n = 28) required deterioration in at least 1 cognitive domain (not including memory), without sufficiently severe cognitive impairment or loss of daily living skills to constitute dementia, or 2 abnormal tests in 2 different domains.16

MRI ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS

Magnetic resonance imaging scans were conducted using a Signa 1.5 Tesla scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). The MRI of the brain was done within 6 months after the initial evaluation. The spoiled gradient-recalled sequence was designed to maximize contrast between gray and white matter (echo time = 5 milliseconds, repetition time = 25 milliseconds, 1.5-mm section, 0-mm intersection interval, 40° flip angle).

All MRI data were processed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM99; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, England) running in MATLAB (Mathworks, Sherborn, Mass). The spoiled gradient recalled images were spatially normalized (Montreal Neurological Institute coordinate system; McGill University, Montreal, Quebec), and the tissue segmented using a modified mixture model cluster analysis technique.17 The segmented gray matter images were then smoothed using an 8-mm isotropic gaussian kernel. A more complete description of voxel-based morphometry method can be found in Good et al18 and Ashburner et al.17


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The demographic characteristics of all subjects and MCI subgroups are shown in Table 1. Fourteen patients with MCI (38%) converted to AD during follow-up (mean ± SD follow-up: 45.7 ± 26.5 months). The proportion of patients with MCI-A (44%) and MCI-MCD (36%) who converted to AD was similar between groups ({chi}2 = 0.65, P = .41). The baseline demographic characteristics of those who converted to AD are shown in Table 2. Overall, those who converted to AD did have lower MMSE (t = 3.2, P = 0.01) and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (t = 4.15, P = .004) scores at the time of study entry compared with nonconverters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients With MCI and Control Subjects



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Demographic and Cognitive Characteristics of Patients With MCI Who Converted to AD and Those Who Did Not


VOXEL-BASED MORPHOMETRY

Patients with MCI, as a group, had significantly decreased volume in the hippocampus and middle temporal gyrus, bilaterally. In addition, the left inferior parietal, left middle frontal, and right superior frontal volumes were also reduced in patients with MCI compared with control subjects (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Gray Matter Atrophy in MCI and MCI Subgroups Compared With Normal Controls


Patients with MCI-A had significantly reduced volume of the mesial temporal lobe on the right, including the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and amygdala (Figure, A) compared with control subjects. In addition, reduced volume was observed in the left inferior parietal, inferior and middle frontal, and superior temporal gyri. Patients diagnosed with MCI-MCD had significant bilateral volume loss of the hippocampus, middle and superior temporal, and inferior frontal gyri compared with controls (Figure, B). In addition, the left inferior parietal gyrus and the right superior frontal gyrus were significantly decreased in patients with MCI-MCD compared with controls (Table 3).



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure. Statistical software SPM99 results, controlling for current chronological age (P<.001), showing regions of reduced gray matter volume in patients with MCI-A (A) and patients with MCI-MCD compared with the comparison subjects (B), controlling for current age. The top rows show results projected onto an averaged template brain. The bottom rows show results projected in the coronal plane onto a mean image of 37 patients with MCI (A, Bottom left image = right hippocampus, y = - 23; bottom right image = right entorhinal/amygdala, y = - 4. B, Bottom left image = bilateral hippocampus, y = - 18; bottom right image = bilateral middle temporal and right inferior frontal, y = - 5). Images are displayed in neurological convention.


Compared with patients with MCI-MCD, patients with MCI-A had significantly greater volume loss in the left inferior parietal lobe (P<.001) and the left entorhinal/perirhinal cortex (P<.01). By contrast, compared with patients with MCI-A, patients with MCI-MCD had significantly greater volume loss in the right inferior frontal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus, bilaterally (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 4. Comparison of Gray Matter Atrophy Between MCI Subgroups


Among all patients with MCI who progressed to AD, there was greater baseline atrophy in the left entorhinal cortex, bilateral superior temporal gyri, and right inferior frontal gyrus (Table 5). Partial correlation analyses, controlling for age, showed significant positive correlations between the MMSE score and the volumes of the left entorhinal cortex (r = 0.35; df = 34; P = .04) and right inferior frontal gyrus (r = 0.36; df = 34; P = .03).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 5. Locations of Significant Differences in Gray Matter Volume Between MCI Converters and Nonconverters



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The present study demonstrates distinct brain structural abnormalities in 2 subgroups of patients with MCI. Specifically, patients with MCI-A have atrophy in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, as expected,3-7 as well as in the amygdala, and in the neocortex. Patients with MCI-MCD showed more diffuse and extensive volume loss in the neocortical heteromodal association, with less involvement of the medial temporal lobe structures compared with those diagnosed with MCI-A. The MCI subgroups share a region of atrophy in the inferior frontal cortex, specifically BA 44/45, suggesting that this region may be important in the clinical presentation of MCI, and perhaps, reflecting the impending defect in retrieval from semantic memory.

Our data also suggest that atrophy in specific cortical regions precede the development of dementia in patients with MCI. Specifically, patients who developed AD during follow-up had significantly decreased volume of the left entorhinal cortex, bilateral superior temporal gyri, and right inferior frontal gyrus at study entry. Volume reduction of the entorhinal cortex and superior temporal gyrus has been noted in recent studies;6, 19 however, our findings suggest additional structural abnormalities within the inferior frontal cortex of those patients with MCI who progress to AD. The degree of cognitive impairment, as measured by the MMSE, appears to be associated with decreased volume in both the frontal and entorhinal areas.

The structural changes associated with the MCI syndrome are more diffuse than previously thought. Although the hippocampus has been the most studied area in MCI cases, more recent studies have shown that structural lesions (eg, neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques) are more widely distributed in MCI, and include the neocortex and limbic areas.20-21 Furthermore, amyloid deposits were identified in vivo in the frontal and parietal lobes in patients with mild AD, and practically no amyloid was seen in the medial temporal lobe structures.22 Therefore, the structural abnormalities in MCI cases, especially in those who progress to AD, are not limited to the mesial temporal areas.

This study is limited by the small sample of MCI subtypes, particularly those who progressed to AD. Nevertheless, our study shows that there are at least 2 subtypes of MCI, those with the more traditionally defined memory deficit and those with more diffuse cognitive impairment, each presenting with distinct brain structural abnormalities. The therapeutic implications of our findings need to be explored, as differences in brain abnormalities may be associated with variations in disease course and treatment response. Better understanding of these subtypes may enhance our knowledge of the relationship between normal aging and dementia.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Oscar L. Lopez, MD, Neuropsychology Research Program, Suite 830, Oxford Bldg, 3501 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (lopezol{at}upmc.edu).

Accepted for Publication: January 4, 2005.

Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Bell-McGinty, Lopez, Meltzer, Scanlon, DeKosky, and Becker. Acquisition of data: Bell-McGinty, Lopez, Meltzer, and Becker. Analysis and interpretation of data: Bell-McGinty, Lopez, Meltzer, Scanlon, Whyte, DeKosky, and Becker. Drafting of the manuscript: Bell-McGinty, Lopez, DeKosky, and Becker. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bell-McGinty, Meltzer, Scanlon, Whyte, DeKosky, and Becker. Statistical analysis: Lopez and Becker. Obtained funding: Bell-McGinty and DeKosky. Administrative, technical, and material support: Bell-McGinty, Meltzer, and DeKosky. Study supervision: Lopez, Meltzer, DeKosky, and Becker.

Funding/Support: This research was supported in part by grants AG05133 and AG20098 from the National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Md; and HL57529 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda. Drs Bell-McGinty, Scanlon, and Whyte are postdoctoral research fellows in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (T32 MH19986). Dr Becker is the recipient of a Research Scientist Development Award, Level-II (K02 MH01077).

Author Affiliations: Departments of Psychiatry (Drs Bell-McGinty, Lopez, Meltzer, Scanlon, Whyte, DeKosky, and Becker), Neurology (Drs Lopez, DeKosky, and Becker), Radiology (Dr Meltzer), and Psychology (Dr Becker), Neuropsychology Research Program, Functional Imaging Research Program, and the Mental Health Intervention Research Center for Late-Life Mood Disorders, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303-308. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:397-405. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Wolf H, Grunwald M, Kruggel F, et al. Hippocampal volume discriminates between normal cognition: questionable and mild dementia in the elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:177-186. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
4. Soininen HS, Partanen K, Pitkanen A, et al. Volumetric MRI analysis of the amygdala and the hippocampus in subjects with age-associated memory impairment: correlation to visual and verbal memory. Neurology. 1994;44:1660-1668. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Convit A, de Asis J, de Leon MJ, Tarshish CY, De Santi S, Rusinek H. Atrophy of the medial occipitotemporal, inferior, and middle temporal gyri in non-demented elderly predict decline to Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:19-26. ISI | PUBMED
6. Killiany RJ, Gomez-Isla T, Moss M, et al. Use of structural magnetic resonance imaging to predict who will get Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:430-439. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
7. Visser PJ, Scheltens P, Verhey FR, et al. Medial temporal lobe atrophy and memory dysfunction as predictors for dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol. 1999;246:477-485. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
8. Visser PJ, Verhey FR, Hofman PA, Scheltens P, Jolles J. Medial temporal lobe atrophy predicts Alzheimer's disease in patients with minor cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:491-497. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Hanninen T, Hallikainen M, Koivisto K, et al. Decline of frontal lobe functions in subjects with age-associated memory impairment. Neurology. 1997;48:148-153. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11:805-821. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
11. Lopez OL, Becker JT, Klunk W, et al. Research evaluation and diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease over the last two decades: I. Neurology. 2000;55:1854-1862. FREE FULL TEXT
12. Mulsant BH, Pollock BG, Nebes RD, et al. A double-blind randomized comparison of nortriptyline and paroxetine in the treatment of late-life depression: 6-week outcome. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(suppl 20):16-20.
13. Jennings JR, Muldoon MF, Ryan CM, et al. Cerebral blood flow in hypertensives: an initial report of reduced and compensatory blood flow responses during performance of two cognitive tasks. Hypertension. 1998;31:1216-1222. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
15. Mattis S. Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. In: Bellak L, Karuso TB, eds. Geriatric Psychiatry. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1976.
16. Lopez OL, Becker JT, Sweet RA. Non-cognitive symptoms in mild cognitive impairment subjects. Neurocase. 2005;11:65-71. ISI | PUBMED
17. Ashburner J, Friston K. Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning: a unified framework. Neuroimage. 1997;6:209-217. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
18. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. A voxel-based morphometric study of aging in 465 normal adult human beings. Neuroimage. 2001;14:21-36. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
19. Killiany RJ, Hyman BT, Gomez-Isla T, et al. MRI measures of entorhinal cortex vs hippocampus in preclinical AD. Neurology. 2002;58:1188-1196. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Price JL, Morris JC. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and "preclinical" Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:358-368. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. Kordower JH, Chu Y, Stebbins GT, et al. Loss and atrophy of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2001;49:202-213. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
22. Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compond-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306-319. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Differences in Brain Volume, Hippocampal Volume, Cerebrovascular Risk Factors, and Apolipoprotein E4 Among Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtypes
He et al.
Arch Neurol 2009;66:1393-1399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

White matter hyperintensities and medial temporal lobe atrophy in clinical subtypes of mild cognitive impairment: the DESCRIPA study
van de Pol et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2009;80:1069-1074.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Level of Executive Function Influences Verbal Memory in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Predicts Prefrontal and Posterior Cingulate Thickness
Chang et al.
Cereb Cortex 2009;0:bhp192v1-bhp192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporoparietal MR Imaging Measures of Atrophy in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment That Predict Subsequent Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease
Desikan et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009;30:532-538.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Morphometric Changes in the Episodic Memory Network and Tau Pathologic Features Correlate with Memory Performance in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment
Fjell et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1183-1189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Structural MR Imaging Findings Predictive of Conversion to Alzheimer Disease
Karas et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:944-949.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive delivery of gene targeting probes to live brains for transcription MRI
Liu et al.
FASEB J. 2008;22:1193-1203.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MRI patterns of atrophy associated with progression to AD in amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Whitwell et al.
Neurology 2008;70:512-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patterns of Atrophy Differ Among Specific Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Whitwell et al.
Arch Neurol 2007;64:1130-1138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

3D maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
Whitwell et al.
Brain 2007;130:1777-1786.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Maintaining adherence and retention in dementia prevention trials.
DeKosky
Neurology 2006;67:S14-S16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The contribution of voxel-based morphometry in staging patients with mild cognitive impairment
Bozzali et al.
Neurology 2006;67:453-460.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neuropsychological characteristics of mild cognitive impairment subgroups
Lopez et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:159-165.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Three-dimensional Patterns of Hippocampal Atrophy in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Becker et al.
Arch Neurol 2006;63:97-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.