You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Alzheimer Disease
 •Dementias
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medial Temporal Hypoperfusion and Aggression in Alzheimer Disease

Krista L. Lanctôt, PhD; Nathan Herrmann, MD, FRCPC; Neelesh K. Nadkarni, MD; Farrell S. Leibovitch, MSc; Curtis B. Caldwell, PhD; Sandra E. Black, MD, FRCPC

Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1731-1737.

ABSTRACT

Background  It is not understood why some patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) display aggression and others do not.

Objective  To examine the relation between regional brain perfusion and aggression in AD.

Design  Single-photon emission computed tomographic scans were coregistered to a standardized template in Talairach space, generating mean ratios of uptake referenced to the cerebellum.

Participants  Forty-nine outpatients (25 men and 24 women; mean ± SD age, 74 ± 11 years) with probable AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score, 17.7 ± 5.0; 30 aggressive and 19 nonaggressive), comparable in age, sex, and severity of cognitive impairment.

Main Outcome Measures  Regional perfusion ratios were determined for 5 bilateral regions of interest: orbitofrontal, middle medial temporal, inferior medial temporal, hypothalamus/thalamus, and anterior cingulate.

Results  Compared with nonaggressive patients, aggressive ones displayed hypoperfusion in the right and left middle medial temporal regions of interest (P = .02 for both), but not the others (all (t tests, unpaired, 2-tailed). On regression analyses, right middle temporal hypoperfusion (P = .001), younger age (P = .002), greater activity disturbances (P = .004), and higher Mini-Mental StateExamination scores (P = .04) independently predicted aggression, accounting for 44% of the total variance (F = 8.7; P<.001). Statistical parametric mapping analyses supported right middle medial temporal hypoperfusion in the aggressive group (P = .008).

Conclusion  In this sample of patients with AD, the right middle medial temporal region emerged as an important neural correlate of aggression.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Although Alzheimer disease (AD) has predominantly been defined in terms of cognitive impairment, its noncognitive symptoms also play a major role in patient morbidity and ongoing functional decline.1 These symptoms, collectively termed behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, include delusions, hallucinations, aggression, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behavior, sleep disturbances, and appetite disturbances.2-3 Among these, aggression has a prevalence of 18% to 65%4-9 depending on the series and is associated with considerable patient morbidity and mortality,10-14 caregiver stress,11 and early institutionalization.15-16 Despite the importance, the neurobiological characteristics of aggression in AD remain poorly understood.

Many studies have been conducted to analyze the underlying neuroanatomy of aggression. Evidence from animal and human studies suggests that the prefrontal cortex17 (particularly the orbitofrontal cortex18-22), the temporolimbic cortex19, 23 (particularly the amygdala20, 22-25 and hippocampus20, 26), and the anterior cingulate cortex22 form the major components of the human aggression regulatory circuit.22 Although studies in nondemented populations have suggested left laterality inaggression,27 studies in dementia (frontotemporal lobar degeneration) have pointed toward right-sided dominance in socially undesirable behavior.28

Neuroimaging correlates have been investigated for some behavioral disturbances, but there is a paucity of information regarding aggression. Agitation/disinhibition has been correlated with frontal and temporal lobe hypometabolism.29 Aggression in AD has been correlated with temporal lobe atrophy on computed tomographic scans,9 and a single study30 in 20 patients suggested that hypometabolism in the left anterior temporal cortex correlated with aggression.

We conducted a study to localize the neural areas involved in aggression in AD on the basis of perfusion changes in the brain using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). We hypothesize that the manifestation of aggression in AD is associated with dysfunction in circumscribed areas of the frontal and temporal regions.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PARTICIPANTS

The Sunnybrook Dementia Study is a longitudinal study of more than 300 patients with AD and other dementias. Patients who met the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria31 for probable AD and who underwent SPECT within 3 months of their behavioral assessments were included in this substudy. Behaviors were assessed using the Behavior Pathology in Alzheimer Disease scale (BEHAVE-AD).32 The aggression subscale of the BEHAVE-AD, which ranges from 0 to 9, was used to characterize participants as "aggressive" if they had an aggression score of 1 or more or "nonaggressive" if they had an aggression score of 0. The aggression subscales contain scores ranging from 0 (not present) to 3 (present with additional components) for each of 3 aggressive behaviors: verbal outbursts, physical threats and violence, and agitation. Some participants had 3 or more visits in the database. If any of these visits indicated aggression, the individual was categorized as aggressive, and a BEHAVE-AD score for aggression and the corresponding SPECT scans were used for analysis. The use of psychotropic medications was also documented.

SPECT SCANS AND REGIONAL PERFUSION RATIOS

The SPECT scans were obtained on all patients with the use of a triple detector gamma camera (Prism 3000XP; Philips Medical Systems Inc, Cleveland, Ohio) 30 minutes after injection of 0.02 Ci (740 MBq) of the radiopharmaceutical technetium Tc 99m ethyl cysteinate dimer. Scans were reconstructed by ramp-filtered back projection, followed by a 3-dimensional postfilter (Wiener filter, multiplier 1.0). Reconstructed images were coregistered to a standardized SPECT template in Talairach space, generating mean ratios of uptake in 79 regions of interest (ROIs) referenced to the cerebellum, thereby providing semiquantitative regional perfusion ratios for each patient. Details of this procedure have been published elsewhere.33 Although brain SPECT does not provide a quantitative measure of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), technetium Tc 99m ethyl cysteinate dimer uptake is known to be approximately proportional to rCBF.34 Uptake in an individual region, scaled to a standard region in the cerebellum, was used to approximate rCBF.

REGIONS OF INTEREST

From the 1 unilateral and 39 bilateral regions defined byLobaugh et al,33 5 ROIs were chosen a priori on the basis of previous literature implicating these regions in aggressive behaviors: the orbitofrontal cortex,18-22 2 temporolimbic cortex ROIs (the middle and inferior regions of the medial temporal gyrus),17, 19, 22-25 the anterior cingulate cortex,35 and the hypothalamus region.36-38 The volumes of the orbitofrontal ROIswere 24.9 cm3 (right) and 25.69 cm3 (left) and included the frontal poles (Brodmann area [BA] 10) and orbitofrontal gyri (BA 11).33 The volumes of the middle medial temporal ROIs were 13.58 cm3 (right) and 13.46 cm3 (left) and included the hippocampus, parahippocampus, and posterior amygdala (BAs 28/35/36). The volumes of the inferior medial temporal ROIs were 11.87 cm3 (right) and 8.80 cm3 (left) and included the posterior hippocampus, posterior parahippocampal gyri, and fusiform gyrus (BAs 28/35/36/37). The volumes of the anterior cingulate ROIs were 12.29 cm3 (right) and 11.65 cm3 (left) and included the combined dorsal (BA 25), middle (BAs 24/32/33), and lateral (BAs 24/32/33) regions of the anterior cingulate. The volumes of the hypothalamus/thalamus ROIs were 10.73 cm3 (right) and 10.75 cm3 (left). Mean rCBF in patients with vs without aggression were compared using unpaired, 2-tailed t tests, and rCBF was correlated with aggression scores using Pearson product moment correlations. Because data analysis was hypothesis driven rather than exploratory, correction for multiple comparisons was not performed. Subsequently, to confirm independent predictors of aggression, backward linear regression using forced entry followed by stepwise removal of the least significant predictor was performed until the best model was reached (SPSS version 10.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Variables entered were ROIs with significant correlations, standard covariates (age, sex, and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score), and behaviors that differed between aggressive and nonaggressive participants. 

IMAGE ANALYSES BY STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING

Data analysis was also conducted using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) software (SPM 99; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, England)39 running under the MATLAB environment (MATLAB version 6.0; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Mass) on Windows XP (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Wash). The program does not analyze data using predefined regions but instead on a voxel-by-voxel basis, producing a map of significance wherein each voxel has a statistical value used to characterize and define regionally specific effects in imaging data. These regionally specific effects are expressed as differences and similarities in intergroup and intragroup comparison of individuals, respectively, over a sequence of observations. The SPM analyses provide uncorrected and corrected P values, where adjustment involves a Bonferroni correction conservatively based on number of voxels in a cluster. Because the voxelwise comparison correction is known to be stringent and prone to false negatives,40 uncorrected and corrected P values are reported. The SPM approach is generally used to identify functionally specialized brain regions and is the most prevalent approach for characterizing functional anatomy and disease-related changes in SPECT, positron emission tomographic, and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. The SPM analyses did not directly test the ROI hypotheses of the study but instead were exploratory.

Images in each group were normalized (transformed) into a standardized stereotactic space using a template image supplied by SPM 99. This template image conforms to the Montreal Neurological Institute template and closely approximates the space described in the atlas by Talairach and Tournoux.41 These normalized images were then smoothed to accommodate intragroup subject differences in anatomy using an isotropic gaussian kernel of 12 mm. Analysis of variance was used to compare the smoothed images in the aggressive and nonaggressive groups. Statistically significant differences in regional perfusion were analyzed by setting opposite contrasts for each group.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PATIENTS AND BEHAVIORS

Forty-nine patients with AD were included in the study (25 men and 24 women; mean ± SD age, 74.0 ± 10.7 years). The mean ± SD MMSE score in all participants was 17.7 ± 5.0, showing moderate impairment. Thirty patients had evidence of verbal or physical aggression with or without agitation (mean ± SD BEHAVE-AD aggression score: 3.0 ± 1.8; 13 patients scored 1-2, 10 scored 3-4, and 7 scored 5-7), and 19 showed no evidence of aggression or agitation. There were no significant differences between the aggressive and nonaggressive groups with respect to age, cognitive status, or sex (P>.05 for all). When the 2 groups were compared for other psychiatric symptoms on the BEHAVE-AD, the aggressive group had higher mean ± SD scores on activity disturbances (eg, wandering) (1.7 ± 2.0 vs 0.6 ± 1.1; P = .03) and sleep disturbances (0.7 ± 1.0 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, P = .02), whereas mean ± SD scores on anxiety (2.2 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 2.4), delusions (2.0 ± 2.1 vs 1.3 ± 2.3), emotions (1.2 ± 1.7 vs 0.7 ± 1.2), and hallucinations (1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.7 ± 1.2) did not differ between the 2 groups (aggressive vs nonaggressive, P>.05 for all).

ROI ANALYSES

Total Sample

Aggressive patients had statistically significantly lower mean rCBF in the right and left middle medial temporal cortices (Figure 1 and Figure 2) but not in the other ROIs (Table 1). Although a statistically significant correlation was seen between aggression and hypoperfusion in the middle section of the right medial temporal gyrus, only a trend was seen in the left middle medial temporal gyrus (Table 2).



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Middle medial temporal region as defined by the single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) template superimposed on magnetic resonance images. The transverse section (A) shows the division of the medial temporal cortex (roughly outlined) into superior (pink), middle (tangerine), and inferior (light green) regions. Sagittal (B) and coronal (C) views of the middle medial temporal region (tangerine) are also shown. The middle medial temporal region (arrow) included the hippocampus, parahippocampus, and posterior amygdala and corresponds to Brodmann areas 28/35/36.




View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Scatterplot comparing ratio of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) referenced to cerebellum in the middle portion of the right medial temporal gyrus in aggressive (n = 30) vs nonaggressive (n = 19) patients. Arrows denote means. The difference in means is significant at P = .02.



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in the Aggressive vs Nonaggressive Groups in 5 Bilateral Regions of Interest*



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Correlation Between Regional Cerebral Perfusion in Regions of Interest for the Total Groupand the Aggressive Group


Regression analysis confirmed that right middle medial temporal hypoperfusion (P = .001), younger age (P = .002), greater activity disturbances (P = .004), and higher MMSE scores (P = .04) independently predicted aggression. The overall model was significant (F = 8.7; P<.001), accounting for 44% of the total variance on BEHAVE-AD aggression. Sleep disturbance (P = .77) and sex (P = .63), were removed from the final model. Sleep disturbance and activity disturbance were included as possible covariates in addition to age, MMSE score, and sex because average ratings on these 2 BEHAVE-AD subscales differed at baseline between the aggressive and nonaggressive groups.

Aggressive Patients Only

To study the relationship between regional perfusion and aggression severity, correlations for the ROIs were repeated in the aggressive group only (n = 30) (Table 2). In this subset, a significant correlation between aggression and hypoperfusion in the right orbitofrontal gyrus was seen (Table 2). Regression analysis confirmed that right middle medial temporal hypoperfusion (P = .02), higher MMSE scores (P = .03), and younger age (P = .004) independently predicted level of aggression. The overall model was significant (F = 5.7; P = .004), accounting for 40% of the variance in severity of aggression. Right orbitofrontal perfusion (P = .41), sex (P = .90), sleep disturbance (P = .45), and activity disturbance (P = .06) were removed from the final model.

SPM RESULTS

Comparison of SPECT images in aggressive and nonaggressive patients on SPM analyses is shown in Figure 3. The Talairach coordinates of areas with significant differences in perfusion are listed in Table 3. The right temporolimbic region, comprising the middle and inferior temporal and parahippocampal regions, constituted the major region of perfusion change on SPM analyses (P<.01, uncorrected). Adifference in perfusion was also seen in the neighboring right parahippocampal and right inferior temporal gyri (P = .01, uncorrected, for both). Other areas ofdifference in perfusion appeared in more posterior regions of the right occipital lobe and right cerebellum (P<.01, uncorrected, for both). Although none of the corrected P values were significant, this analysis supported the ROI findings.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Statistical parametric mapping projections showing areas with reduced cerebral perfusion in aggressive patients with Alzheimer disease compared with nonaggressive control subjects. Views are glass brains showing sagittal (A), coronal (B), and transverse (C) sections. Arrows indicate the medial temporal region. The Talairach coordinates of these regions are listed in Table 3.



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Results of Statistical Parametric Mapping Analyses*


CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS

The proportions of aggressive vs nonaggressive participants using cholinesterase inhibitors (14/30 vs 8/19), antipsychotics (1/30 vs 1/19), antidepressants (9/30 vs 1/19), anxiolytics (3/30 vs 1/19), mood stabilizers (0/30 vs 1/19), and antiepileptics (2/30 vs 4/19) were not significantly different based on Fisher exact tests (P>.05 for all). Furthermore, perfusion in the right middle medial temporal gyrus was not significantly different for individuals taking cholinesterase inhibitors compared with those who were not (t = 1.0; P = .30) or for those taking antidepressants compared with those who were not (t = 0.92; P = .36).


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The results of this study indicate that hypoperfusion in the middle region of the right medial temporal gyrus may be associated with aggressive behaviors in AD. This region of the temporal lobe includes the hippocampus, parahippocampus, and posterior amygdala and corresponds to BAs 28/35/36. The temporolimbic lobes have been implicated in episodes of rage and aggression.22-23,26, 42-43 In particular, the medial temporal lobe has been associated with aggression in experimental paradigms in healthy volunteers,25 in neurosurgical manipulation in animals,24 and in nondemented aggressive populations22-23,43 using SPECT19 and positron emission tomography.17, 20 A previous study9 of AD reported an association between the presence of aggression (n = 22/136), defined as behavior that results in actual or potential harm to another person, and a higher proportion of subjects with temporal lobe atrophy on computed tomographic scans (22/22 vs 103/114). Our findings are an extension of those findings and specifically implicate the middle section ofthe right medial temporal region. A second study, byHirono et al,30 correlated aggression with hypoperfusion in the anterior temporal cortex of a group with mixed dementia. Our study differs from that study in 4 important ways. First, we used a novel quantitative analysis method33 in addition to SPM analyses39 to delineate areas of altered perfusion in the aggressive and nonaggressive groups in AD. Second, our results are based on a considerably larger sample of aggressive individuals, and the previous study was limited to 10 aggressive patients. There are also differences in coexisting behavioral disturbance. The aggressive subjects in the study by Hirono et al30 also had high levels of apathy and depression. In fact, the mean scores on the apathy and depression scales were higher than that on the aggression/agitation subscale. In our aggressive patients, the mean score on the aggressive subscale was the highest of all the subscales. Last, 20% of that population had diagnoses other than probable AD.

The difference in mean right medial temporal perfusion between the aggressive and nonaggressive groups was approximately 0.05 (difference in ratio of rCBF values referenced to the cerebellum: 0.58 vs 0.63). Although this difference is small compared with some of the differences between regions, it is of the same magnitude as significant regional differences in other SPECT studies (eg, Pasquier et al44). The expected magnitude of differences leading to neuropsychiatric symptoms is unknown. In the studies by Burns et al9 and Hirono et al,30 regional differences are not quantified. Our findings imply that a certain threshold may be crossed in this region relative to others.

The temporolimbic lobe structures—the entorhinal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampus—also play an important role in cognition45-47 and are implicated in the pathologic processes of AD early in its course.48-49 Our results suggest that this region is a correlate of aggression even when cognitive status is taken into account. In addition to greater right medial temporal hypoperfusion, level of aggression was correlated with a higher MMSE score and a younger age, indicating that there may be a subgroup of patients experiencing earlier and more extensive right-sided medial temporalatrophy.

The results of this study also support the relationship of right-hemisphere dominance in regulation of behaviors. Right medial temporal hypoperfusion discriminated aggressive and nonaggressive participants. These findings are in contrast to those of Hirono et al,30 who found left-sided dominance. As mentioned previously herein, the Hirono et al population had high levels of depression and apathy, higher in fact than the aggression scores. Apathy has been associated with a right anterior cingulate deficit,50-51 and depression has been associated with decreased left medial temporal activity,52 which may have obscured rCBF results. The literature supports the possibility of right-sided dominance. Socially undesirable behaviors are a feature of right-sided frontotemporal dementia.28, 53 Specifically, Mychack et al28 reported that of 12 patients with right-sided frontotemporal dementia, 9 exhibited aggression. The results of our study suggest that the right-hemisphere dominance of socially undesirable behaviors is not limited to frontotemporal dementia but may also be the case in AD, which may stem from right-hemisphere dominance in the comprehension and expression of emotions.28, 53

The SPM analyses were used to identify additional areas potentially involved in aggression that were not evaluated in the hypothesis-driven ROI analysis. Findings from the SPM analyses suggest that 2 other regions, 1 in the occipital lobe and 1 in the cerebellum, might also be related to aggressive behavior. The bilateral cerebellar activation found on the SPM analyses is in keeping with the disinhibited or inappropriate behavior often seen in cerebellar lesions, described as the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome.54 Although the occipital cortices are not typically involved in aggression, it is possible that visual disturbances may lead to misinterpretation of stimuli, which in turn stimulates aggression. The occipital cortices are typically involved later in the course of AD,48 a stage of AD characterized by prominent behavioral symptoms. However, the possibility of hypoperfusion in the occipital, lingual, fusiform, and precentral gyri in the SPM analyses being associated with stage of disease rather than aggression per se cannot be ruled out. The SPM analyses did not include covariates such as cognitive status and age, which were correlated with aggression. Studies that use larger sample sizes should be undertaken to fully understand the potential role of these individual regions in the manifestation of aggression. We offer these results to stimulate further testing of traditional and newly identified areas in new and larger samples.

The presence of activity disturbances was also found to be a predictor of aggression. The activity disturbances subscale of the BEHAVE-AD includes items for wandering, purposeless repetitive activity, inappropriate sexual behavior, and disinhibition.32 Agitation is a descriptive term also used to collectively describe wandering, pacing, restlessness, inappropriate disrobing, and verbal outbursts.55 Agitation is one of the items of the aggression subscale of the BEHAVE-AD. Therefore, patients with agitation could be expected to elicit scores on the aggression and activity disturbances subscales. Thus, the fact that activity disturbances were a predictor of aggression may be because of the presence of agitated behaviors in many of the aggressive participants.

These results must be interpreted with caution, because many participants were taking concomitant medications that could affect cerebral perfusion. An excessive use of medications in the aggressive group, however, would not be expected to lead to the hypoperfusion that was demonstrated. Nevertheless, although our analysis showed that the proportion of participants taking each major class of psychotropic medications was not different for aggressive and nonaggressive patients, the possibility of confounding by concomitant medications cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, because data analysis was hypothesis driven rather than exploratory, correction for multiple comparisons was not performed. As a result, the possibility of a type I error is greater than.05.

In summary, we sought to elucidate the neurobiological characteristics of aggression in AD using SPECT. We found that hypoperfusion in the middle part of the right medial temporal gyrus was associated with the presence of aggression and correlated with the severity of aggression in AD. These findings further support the hypothesis that pathologic processes in this region are responsible for specific behavioral manifestations that accompany cognitive deficits.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Krista L. Lanctôt, PhD, Neuropharmacology Research, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room FG 05, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5 (Krista.Lanctot{at}sw.ca).

Accepted for Publication: March 19, 2004.

Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Lanctôt, Herrmann, and Black. Acquisition of data: Lanctôt, Caldwell, and Black. Analysis and interpretation of data: Lanctôt, Herrmann, Nadkarni, Leibovitch, Caldwell, and Black. Drafting of the manuscript: Lanctôt, Herrmann, and Nadkarni. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Lanctôt, Herrmann, Nadkarni, Leibovitch, Caldwell, and Black. Statistical analysis: Lanctôt, Nadkarni, and Leibovitch. Obtained funding: Black. Administrative, technical, and material support :Herrmann, Leibovitch, Caldwell, and Black. Studysupervision: Black.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant MT13129 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario (Dr Black, and by the Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit of the Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Lanctôt).

Acknowledgment: We thank Stephanie J. Hevenor,Shehnaz Moosa, and Lyla R. Khan for their invaluable assistance in technical and administrative matters involved in completing this project.

Author Affiliations: Neuropharmacology Research, Department of Psychiatry (Drs Lanctôt, Herrmann, and Nadkarni), Cognitive Neurology Unit and Neuroscience Research Program (Mr Leibovitch), Department of Medical Imaging (Drs Caldwell and Black), and Department of Medicine–Neurology (Drs Nadkarni and Black and Mr Leibovitch), Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre; and Departments of Pharmacology (Dr Lanctôt), Psychiatry (Drs Lanctôt and Herrmann), and Medicine (Drs Herrmann, Nadkarni, and Black) and Institute of Medical Science (Drs Herrmann, Nadkarni, and Black), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Finkel S. Introduction to behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(suppl 1):S2-S4.
2. Finkel SI, Costa e Silva J, Cohen G, Miller S, Sartorius N. Behavioral and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia: a consensus statement on current knowledge and implications for research and treatment. Int Psychogeriatr. 1996;8:497-500.
3. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44:2308-2314. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Petrie WM, Lawson EC, Hollender MH. Violence in geriatric patients. JAMA. 1982;248:443-444. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Rabins PV, Mace NL, Lucas MJ. The impact of dementia on the family. JAMA. 1982;248:333-335. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Cohen-Mansfield J, Billig N. Agitated behaviors in the elderly, I: a conceptual review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:711-721. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
7. Ryden MB. Aggressive behavior in persons with dementia who live in the community. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1988;2:342-355. PUBMED
8. Nagaratnam N, Lewis-Jones M, Scott D, Palazi L. Behavioral and psychiatric manifestations in dementia patients in a community: caregiver burden and outcome. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1998;12:330-334. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
9. Burns A, Jacoby R, Levy R. Psychiatric phenomena in Alzheimer’s disease, IV: disorders of behaviour. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;157:86-94. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Evans LK, Strumpf NE. Tying down the elderly: a review of the literature on physical restraint. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37:65-74. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
11. Keene J, Hope T, Fairburn CG, Jacoby R, Gedling K, Ware CJ. Natural history of aggressive behaviour in dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14:541-548. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
12. Lopez OL, Wisniewski SR, Becker JT, Boller F, DeKosky ST. Psychiatric medication and abnormal behavior as predictors of progression in probable Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:1266-1272. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Marx MS, Cohen-Mansfield J, Werner P. Agitation and falls in institutionalized elderly persons. J Appl Gerontol. 1990;9:106-117. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Moritz DJ, Fox PJ, Luscombe FA, Kraemer HC. Neurological and psychiatric predictors of mortality in patients with Alzheimer disease in California. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:878-885. FREE FULL TEXT
15. Steele C, Rovner B, Chase GA, Folstein M. Psychiatric symptoms and nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:1049-1051. FREE FULL TEXT
16. Gibbons P, Gannon M, Wrigley M. A study of aggression among referrals to a community-based psychiatry of old age service. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12:384-388. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
17. Volkow ND, Tancredi LR, Grant C, et al. Brain glucose metabolism in violent psychiatric patients: a preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 1995;61:243-253. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
18. Lee R, Coccaro E. The neuropsychopharmacology of criminality and aggression. Can J Psychiatry. 2001;46:35-44. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
19. Amen DG, Stubblefield M, Carmicheal B, Thisted R. Brain SPECT findings and aggressiveness. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1996;8:129-137. PUBMED
20. Raine A, Meloy JR, Bihrle S, Stoddard J, LaCasse L, Buchsbaum MS. Reduced prefrontal and increased subcortical brain functioning assessed using positron emission tomography in predatory and affective murderers. Behav Sci Law. 1998;16:319-332. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
21. Brower MC, Price BH. Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:720-726. FREE FULL TEXT
22. Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL. Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation: a possible prelude to violence. Science. 2000;289:591-594. FREE FULL TEXT
23. Weiger WA, Bear DM. An approach to the neurology of aggression. J Psychiatr Res. 1988;22:85-98. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
24. Zagrodzka J, Hedberg CE, Mann GL, Morrison AR. Contrasting expressions of aggressive behavior released by lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala during wakefulness and rapid eye movement sleep without atonia in cats. Behav Neurosci. 1998;112:589-602. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
25. Isenberg N, Silbersweig D, Engelien A, et al. Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:10456-10459. FREE FULL TEXT
26. Trimble MR, Mendez MF, Cummings JL. Neuropsychiatric symptoms from the temporolimbic lobes. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;9:429-438. FREE FULL TEXT
27. Convit A, Czobor P, Volavka J. Lateralized abnormality in the EEG of persistently violent psychiatric inpatients. Biol Psychiatry. 1991;30:363-370. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
28. Mychack P, Kramer JH, Boone KB, Miller BL. The influence of right frontotemporal dysfunction on social behavior in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2001;56(suppl 4):S11-S15. FREE FULL TEXT
29. Sultzer DL, Mahler ME, Mandelkern MA, et al. The relationship between psychiatric symptoms and regional cortical metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;7:476-484. FREE FULL TEXT
30. Hirono N, Mega MS, Dinov ID, Mishkin F, Cummings JL. Left frontotemporal hypoperfusion is associated with aggression in patients with dementia. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:861-866. FREE FULL TEXT
31. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939-944. FREE FULL TEXT
32. Reisberg B, Borenstein J, Salob SP, Ferris SH, Franssen E, Georgotas A. Behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: phenomenology and treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48(suppl):9-15.
33. Lobaugh NJ, Caldwell CB, Black SE, Leibovitch FS, Swartz RH. Three brain SPECT region-of-interest templates in elderly people: normative values, hemispheric asymmetries, and a comparison of single- and multihead cameras. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:45-56. FREE FULL TEXT
34. Matsuda H, Yagishita A, Tsuji S, Hisada K. A quantitative approach to technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer: a comparison with technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;22:633-637. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
35. Tekin S, Mega MS, Masterman DM, et al. Orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex neurofibrillary tangle burden is associated with agitation in Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2001;49:355-361. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
36. Tonkonogy JM, Geller JL. Hypothalamic lesions and intermittent explosive disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1992;4:45-50. FREE FULL TEXT
37. Ramamurthi B. Stereotactic operation in behaviour disorders: amygdalotomy and hypothalamotomy. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1988;44:152-157. PUBMED
38. Reeves AG, Plum F. Hyperphagia, rage, and dementia accompanying a ventromedial hypothalamic neoplasm. Arch Neurol. 1969;20:616-624. FREE FULL TEXT
39. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KL, Poline JP, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 1995;2:189-210. FULL TEXT
40. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11:805-821. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
41. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1988.
42. Volkow ND, Tancredi L. Neural substrates of violent behaviour: a preliminary study with positron emission tomography. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;151:668-673. ABSTRACT
43. Elliott FA. Violence: the neurologic contribution: an overview. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:595-603. FREE FULL TEXT
44. Pasquier J, Michel BF, Brenot-Rossi I, Hassan-Sebbag N, Sauvan R, Gastaut JL. Value of 99mTc-ECD SPET for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1342-1348. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
45. Squire LR, Zola-Morgan S. The medial temporal lobe memory system. Science. 1991;253:1380-1386. FREE FULL TEXT
46. Keane MM, Gabrieli JD, Fennema AC, Growdon JH, Corkin S. Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Neurosci. 1991;105:326-342. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
47. Kohler S, Black SE, Sinden M, et al. Memory impairments associated with hippocampal versus parahippocampal-gyrus atrophy: an MR volumetry study in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:901-914. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
48. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1991;82:239-259.
49. Hof PR, Bierer LM, Perl DP, et al. Evidence for early vulnerability of the medial and inferior aspects of the temporal lobe in an 82-year-old patient with preclinical signs of dementia: regional and laminar distribution of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:946-953. FREE FULL TEXT
50. Benoit M, Dygai I, Migneco O, et al. Behavioral and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: relation between apathy and regional cerebral perfusion. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10:511-517. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
51. Assal F, Cummings JL. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in the dementias. Curr Opin Neurol. 2002;15:445-450. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
52. Hirono N, Mori E, Ishii K, et al. Frontal lobe hypometabolism and depression in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1998;50:380-383. FREE FULL TEXT
53. Perry RJ, Rosen HR, Kramer JH, Beer JS, Levenson RL, Miller BL. Hemispheric dominance for emotions, empathy and social behaviour: evidence from right and left handers with frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase. 2001;7:145-160. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
54. Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121:561-579. FREE FULL TEXT
55. Cohen-Mansfield J, Deutsch LH. Agitation: subtypes and their mechanisms. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1996;1:325-339. PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.