You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 8, August 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Progressive Worsening of Spatial and Chromatic Processing Deficits in Parkinson Disease

Nico J. Diederich, MD; Rema Raman, MS; Sue Leurgans, PhD; Christopher G. Goetz, MD

Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1249-1252.

ABSTRACT

Context  Impairments of color discrimination (CD) and contrast sensitivity are established signs of Parkinson disease (PD), but their temporal evolution has not been studied.

Objective  To determine whether there is progressive, longitudinal deterioration of color discrimination (CD) and contrast sensitivity (CS) in PD.

Design  A prospective study.

Setting  Tertiary care center–based sample of PD patients without dementia with normal visual acuity (Snellen fraction >0.6 in the best eye).

Main Outcome Measures  With a mean ± SD interval of 19.8 ± 2.8 months, the following tests were applied twice in 28 patients: the Lanthony D15 test and the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue test as tests of CD and the monocular and binocular Pelli-Robson test and the binocular Vistech tables as tests of CS.

Results  There was deterioration of both CD (Farnsworth Munsell 100 hue test: P = .002) and CS (binocular Vistech test at a spatial frequency of 6 cycles per degree, P<.001). Both deficits correlated with age, and the chromatic deficit additionally correlated with higher impairment of motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section, P = .04) and activities of daily life (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living section, P = .006). Patients with the highest pathologic psychiatric rating score (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) performed worse on both CS (P = .02) and CD (P = .01) at the second examination.

Conclusions  Impairments of CD and CS in PD are progressive over time. Visual deficits may influence overall motor function and lead to enhanced motor impairment.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

IN PARKINSON DISEASE (PD) visual pathways can be affected at different levels. In autopsy studies of unmedicated PD patients, retinal dopamine concentration is reduced.1 MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) intoxication in patients and monkeys produces a pathologic electroretinogram, implicating a role of dopamine in the center-surround organization of the receptive field.2 Pathologic changes beyond the retina are suggested by abnormal responses of the visual P300 waves and by reduced cerebral metabolism in the occipital area.3 In the clinical setting, visual processing deficits have been established in several studies. Patients with PD have reduced contrast sensitivity (CS), with maximal deficits in horizontal gratings and medium spatial frequencies. These changes are influenced by stage and duration of the disease and circadian variability.4-6 The deficits of color discrimination (CD) are detected early in the disease7; the tritan axis is most affected, and dopaminergic treatment can improve the deficits. To our knowledge, there has been no longitudinal study of visual impairment with correlation to other parkinsonian features. We therefore designed a study to determine whether there is deterioration of CS and CD in PD and to monitor such changes in the context of clinical motor function.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Thirty-one patients with idiopathic PD who had previously participated in visual tests volunteered for this follow-up study. Three were excluded because of low visual acuity as defined by a Snellen fraction of less than 0.6 in the best eye (2 patients) and dementia as defined as a score of less than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (1 patient). Thus, 28 patients were examined twice and their visual test results were compared. None of the study subjects had florid psychosis as determined by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), inborn color blindness as defined by the Ishihara plates, or other coexistent neurologic disease potentially worsening visual perception. Each patient was examined in the same way as in the first session with the same investigator, room, and lighting conditions. The same battery of ophthalmologic and clinical examinations was applied in the same sequence, with the patients being "on" (mobile) and taking their usual medications. The examiner did not have access to the individual test results from the first session. In addition to the tests already mentioned, these examinations included the Lanthony D15 test (LD) and the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue test (FM) as tests of CD and the monocular and binocular Pelli-Robson test (PR) and the binocular Vistech tables (VT) as tests of CS. These test pairs are each time complementary: the LD is a succinct CD screening test, and the FM is a largely accepted and user-friendly CD test that separately explores different color axes. The PR compares monocular vs binocular CS, whereas the VT explores different spatial frequencies (cycles per degree [cpd]).8 All these tests have already been applied to PD patients; they have easy instructions and require only short spans of attention. We further applied the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), including the section of activities of daily living (ADL), and the Schwab and England test. Both test series were performed between 8 AM and 5 PM. All technical prerequisites were identical and have been described in detail.9 The mean ± SD time interval between the examinations was 19.8 ± 2.8 months. The statistical analysis used standard descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Continuous data are summarized as means ± SDs. Statistical significance is recognized at P<.05.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

On the follow-up examination, the mean ± SD age was 65.2 ± 12.3 years; PD duration, 13.53 ± 9.14 years; and levodopa treatment duration, 8.57 ± 7.04 years. At the follow-up examination, patients performed worse on all the visual tests with the exception of the LD, the results of which showed a nonsignificant improvement. The deteriorations concerned the total color spectrum and monocular and binocular CS, especially at the middle spatial frequencies. Statistically significant declines were seen with the FM, for 3 of 5 VT scores, and at the monocular PR (P = .04 to P<.001) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Performances on Contrast Sensitivity and Color Discrimination in 28 Patients With Parkinson Disease at Baseline and Follow-up Examination*


The comparison of the most significant visual findings (the VT score at 6 cpd for CS and the total FM score for CD) with covariables showed that the deterioration in CS (follow-up value minus baseline value) correlated with age (P<.001), duration of PD (P = .02), and follow-up scores of Hoehn and Yahr stage (P = .04), UPDRS motor (P = .04), and ADL (P = .006) assessments. There was no significant correlation with levodopa dosage or UPDRS mental score. The decline in CD (follow-up value minus baseline value) showed only a mild correlation with age (P = .04). The comparison with psychiatric rating scores revealed that the patients with the highest BPRS scores at the follow-up examination performed worse on both CS (P = .02) and CD (P = .01) at this examination. However, there was no statistically significant group decline in motor, behavioral, or global function, as tested by the UPDRS and Schwab and England tests, and the medication remained the same (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Principal Disease Variables in 28 Patients With Parkinson Disease at Baseline and Follow-up Examination*



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

In PD, CS and CD have been shown to be independent of each other; their impairment is worse in PD patients than in age-matched controls.6 In contrast to prior cross-sectional studies, ours is the first longitudinal study and documents the progressive deficits in both CD and CS. We applied a strict study protocol to ensure that the 2 testing sessions were identical. With the exception of the LD, the deterioration of CS and CD was evident throughout the test battery. The most powerful changes were seen in the tests that are also the most sensitive ones in cross-sectional studies, namely, the total score of the FM for CD and the changes at the medium spatial frequencies for CS.10 These changes cannot be owing to a decline in visual acuity, because we excluded patients with low Snellen scores from the follow-up examination. The decline of contrast vision was directly correlated with follow-up motor function scores and age. Nevertheless, deterioration of CS and CD cannot be seen as an exclusive aging phenomenon for several reasons: (1) cross-sectional studies have convincingly demonstrated that, in terms of decline of CD and CS, PD patients are "in advance" (doing worse) compared with age-matched peers; (2) influence of visual aging of CS is most prominent at high spatial frequencies,11 a phenomenon not seen in this study; and (3) aging of CD acts through blue-yellow confusions,12 and again, there was no significant change of this section of the FM in our group. Additive or overlapping effects of aging and PD are, however, possible. It has been proposed that motion sensitivity (spatial frequencies of 1 and 4 cpd, seen at temporal frequencies of 1 and 3 Hz) can better discriminate than static sensitivity between PD progression and aging.10 However, motion detection is not only luminance dependent but also color specific,13 which brings us back to test CD; furthermore, there are no confirming longitudinal studies for this hypothesis.

No specific item in the UPDRS focuses on visual function, so the clinical impact of our observations cannot be fully delineated. However, the correlation of visual deficits and UPDRS and ADL follow-up scores suggests that the progressive character of color and contrast deficits may affect patient function. The link with the psychiatric rating (BPRS) does not tell us which comes first, visual impairment or psychiatric deterioration; although, in a previous study,9 we demonstrated that patients with visual impairment are at higher risk for developing visual hallucinations. Because of the insidious character of deterioration of contrast and color perception, the patients may not be able to compensate in the same way as they might for a suddenly apparent but nonprogressive visual deficit. Lack of correct visual feedback may subjectively "rattle" the patient while walking. Errors of contrast and color perception may raise the potential for overinterpretations or misinterpretations of the visual input and thus cause or contribute to various clinical signs, such as frequent falls, misperceptions of distances and contours, illusions, and even visual hallucinations.9, 14 A larger follow-up study using multivariate techniques should clarify possible links to these frequent signs of advanced PD.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication May 7, 2002.

Author contributions: Study concept and design (Drs Diederich and Goetz); acquisition of data (Dr Diederich); analysis and interpretation of data (Drs Diederich, Leurgans, and Goetz and Ms Raman); drafting of the manuscript (Drs Diederich and Goetz and Ms Raman); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (Drs Diederich, Leurgans, and Goetz); statistical expertise (Drs Diederich and Leurgans and Ms Raman); obtained funding (Dr Diederich); administrative, technical, and material support (Dr Goetz); study supervision (Dr Goetz).

This study was supported by Foundation Think, Luxembourg, and the Parkinson Disease Foundation, New York, NY.

This study was presented as a poster at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, San Diego, Calif, May 1, 2000.

Corresponding author and reprints: Nico J. Diederich, MD, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 4, rue Barblé, L-1210, Luxembourg (e-mail: diederich.nico{at}chl.lu).

From the Departments of Neurological Sciences (Drs Diederich, Leurgans, and Goetz) and Preventive Medicine (Dr Leurgans and Ms Raman), Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill; and Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg (Dr Diederich).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Patients and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Harnois C, Di Paolo T. Decreased dopamine in the retinas of patients with Parkinson's disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2473-2475. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Bodis-Wollner IG, Antal A. On the functional significance of primate retinal dopamine receptors. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1995;45:67-74. Review. PUBMED
3. Bohnen NI, Minoshima S, Giordani B, Frey KA, Kuhl DE. Motor correlates of occipital glucose hypometabolism in Parkinson's disease without dementia. Neurology. 1999;52:541-546. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Hutton JT, Morris JL, Elias JW, Varma R, Poston JN. Spatial contrast sensitivity is reduced bilateral in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1991;41:1200-1202. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Price MJ, Feldman RG, Adelberg D, Kaynes H. Abnormalities in color vision and contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1992;42:887-890. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Pieri V, Diederich NJ, Raman R, Goetz CG. Decreased color discrimination and contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2000;172:7-11. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
7. Büttner Th, Kuhn W, Müller Th, Patzold T, Heidbrink K, Przuntek H. Distorted color discrimination in de novo Parkinsonian patients. Neurology. 1995;45:386-387. ABSTRACT
8. Acheson JF, Sanders MD. Vision. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;59:4-15. ISI | PUBMED
9. Diederich NJ, Goetz CG, Raman R, Pappert EJ, Leurgans S, Piery V. Poor visual discrimination and visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1998;21:289-295. ISI | PUBMED
10. Bodis-Wollner IG, Paulus W. Visual and visual cognitive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: spatial and chromatic dysfunction. Adv Neurol. 1999;80:383-388. PUBMED
11. Kline DW. Aging and the spatiotemporal discrimination performance of the visual system. Eye. 1987;1:323-329.
12. Pinckers A. Color vision and age. Ophthalmologica. 1980;181:23-30. ISI | PUBMED
13. Cropper SJ, Derrington AM. Rapid colour-specific detection of motion in human vision. Nature. 1996;379:72-74. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
14. Fénelon G, Mahieux F, Huon R, Ziegler M. Hallucinations in Parkinson's disease: prevalence, phenomenology and risk factors. Brain. 2000;123:733-745. FREE FULL TEXT

RELATED ARTICLE

Visualizing the Next Steps in Parkinson Disease
Ivan Bodis-Wollner
Arch Neurol. 2002;59(8):1233-1234.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Visual dysfunction in Parkinson disease without dementia
Uc et al.
Neurology 2005;65:1907-1913.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Independent patterns of damage within magno-, parvo- and koniocellular pathways in Parkinson's disease
Silva et al.
Brain 2005;128:2260-2271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychosis in Parkinson's Disease
Wint et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004;17:127-136.
ABSTRACT  

Ophthalmologic features of Parkinson's disease
Biousse et al.
Neurology 2004;62:177-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dysfunction of the basal ganglia, but not the cerebellum, impairs kinaesthesia
Maschke et al.
Brain 2003;126:2312-2322.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Visualizing the Next Steps in Parkinson Disease
Bodis-Wollner
Arch Neurol 2002;59:1233-1234.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.