 |
|
Diagnosing Brain Death Using the Transcranial Doppler With a Transorbital Approach
Yair Lampl, MD;
Ronit Gilad, MD;
Yehiel Eschel, MD;
Mona Boaz, PhD;
Abraham Rapoport, MD;
Menachem Sadeh, MD
Arch Neurol. 2002;59:58-60.
ABSTRACT
| |
Background Transcranial Doppler is a sensitive instrument for the diagnosis of
brain death. The guidelines for the determination of brain death include the
demonstration of specific blood flow patterns in the anterior and posterior
circulation systems. A limitation of this method is the frequent false finding
of no flow, especially when using the transtemporal approach in older women.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the transorbital approach in the diagnosis
of brain death using transcranial Doppler.
Methods A prospective controlled, diagnostic test study was performed. Transorbital,
transtemporal, and transforaminal approaches were used. Fifty-seven patients
(29 men and 28 women; mean ± SD age, 68.2 ± 12.1 years) with
clinically determined brain death were examined.
Results In 45 patients, oscillatory flow or systolic spikes were found in all
approaches. In 4 patients, no flow was detected. In 6 patients, oscillatory
flow or systolic spikes were found in 2 approaches, including the transorbital
one. In 2 patients, a positive finding was demonstrated only using the transorbital
approach. Using the transorbital approach, the percentage of positive findings
with definitive diagnoses of brain death rose from 79% to 88%.
Conclusion The transorbital approach is a useful addition for the diagnosis of
brain death, using the transcranial Doppler technique.
INTRODUCTION
IN MODERN SOCIETY, brain death is accepted as an objective indicator
of the end of life and is defined as the absence of all brain functions. Since
1994, the standards committees of various neurological societies have agreed
that the burden of brain status determination is a clinical decision and have
defined the use of laboratory examinations as confirmatory tests.1-3 The specific patterns
of blood flow found in brain death using transcranial Doppler (TCD) are a
useful aid in the diagnosis of brain death.4
Nevertheless, the high percentage (10%-15%) of technical errors, in which
no blood flow was observed, has limited the use of this test.2
No flow of the middle cerebral arteries may indicate total cessation of blood
flow, or the blood flow may be indiscernible because of temporal bone thickness.
According to the Task Force Group on cerebral death of the Neurosonology Research
Group of the World Federation of Neurology, the absence of signal represents
a limitation of the method in most cases. The task force amended the defining
criteria of brain death to include: "Systolic spikes or oscillating flow in
any cerebral artery which can be recorded by bilateral transcranial insonation
of ICA [internal carotid artery] and MCA [middle cerebral artery], respectively,
and any branch or other artery which can be recorded (anterior and posterior
circulation)."4(p147) Nevertheless, the transorbital
approach, which may be used for demonstrating a positive pattern flow in the
anterior circulation arteries, is only sporadically adopted for the purpose
of defining brain death.
The aim of the study was to evaluate whether routine additional use
of the transorbital approach in all patients suspected of brain death after
undergoing TCD might increase the efficacy of the examination and decrease
the frequency of inconclusive results.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
All patients with clinically determined brain death at The E. Wolfson
Medical Center, Holon, Israel, between January 1994 and December 1999 were
examined. The examinations were performed according to the guidelines for
determining brain death,2 and all patients
met the criteria for the definition of brain death. The TCD examination was
performed according to the policy set forth by the medical center's brain
death committee for use in these situations. A determination of death was
required in cases of organ donor use or other similar purposes. The cause
of deep coma had been established and was sufficient to account for a permanent
loss of brain function. Patients with intoxication, hypothermia, or hypotonus
(systolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg) were excluded.4
Using the TCD, each patient was examined separately for 30 minutes and then
at 5-minute intervals by 2 staff members (1 technician and 1 physician [Y.L.])
familiar with the method for evaluating brain death. Blood flow velocities
were measured by transtemporal (middle cerebral artery at a depth of 50-55
mm laterally), transforaminal (vertebral and basilar arteries at a depth of
60-100 mm), and transorbital (at a depth of 55-70 mm laterally) approaches.
Abnormal flow patterns were an oscillating flow and systolic spike pattern
(positive pattern) or no flow. Insonation was accomplished using a 2-MHz transducer
with 100% power (Intra-View; Rimed, Raanana, Israel). Because transorbital
insonation was used with 100% power, signed consent was obtained from the
patients' family members.
Data were stored on a spreadsheet with Hebrew language support (Excel
97; Microsoft, Seattle, Wash). Analysis of data was carried out using commercially
available software (STATISTIX, version 4.0; Analytical Software Co, La Jolla,
Calif). Age is reported as mean ± SD. Frequency counts for all other
data were obtained. The transorbital approach was compared independently with
every other approach using the  2 test for homogeneity. In
cases with expected low frequencies, the Fisher exact test was used. For each
test, total observed agreement and  were calculated. All differences
were considered significant at P<.05.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven patients (29 men and 28 women) were examined. Their mean
± SD age was 68.2 ± 12.1 years (range, 38-91 years): men, 66.2
± 11.9 years (range, 38-91 years) and women, 71.1 ± 10.3 years
(range, 42-90 years). The interobserver reliability was 0.91.
In 45 patients (25 men and 20 women), oscillating flow or systolic spikes
were found in all approaches. In 4 patients (2 men and 2 women), no flow was
detected in all of the tests. In 5 patients (all women), oscillating flow
or systolic spikes were found only in the transorbital and transforaminal
approaches; in 1 man, only in the transorbital and transtemporal approaches;
and in 2 patients (1 man and 1 woman), only in the transorbital approach (Table 1). In all subjects, the diagnosis
was confirmed by the recording of extracranial bilateral signals of anterior
and posterior circulation. The observed agreement between the transorbital
and transtemporal approaches was 0.96 (P = .008,
= 0.78). The observed agreement between the transorbital and transforaminal
approaches was 0.92 (P = .02, = 0.63).
|
|
|
|
Findings of the Various Transcranial Doppler Approaches*
|
|
|
COMMENT
Transcranial Doppler is an additional method to evaluate brain death.4 In its consensus statement, the American Academy of
Neurology stated the limitations of its efficacy.2
Researchers have noted the necessity of finding a suitable blood vessel in
the anterior circulation for diagnosing brain death but have not developed
the appropriate technical approach.3 The efficacy
of TCD for diagnosing brain death is uncertain, and the results are controversial.
Some authors have reported a sensitivity in the range of 100%,5
and others between 90% and 95%.6-8
Still, other researchers conclude that use of TCD in determining brain death
has only questionable efficacy and that other methods are superior in the
final diagnosis of brain death.9
Transcranial Doppler offers high sensitivity and specificity for a positive
pattern of systolic spikes and oscillating flow. However, because of the difficulty
in penetrating the temporal bone barrier with TCD, 10% to 15% of results have
demonstrated a false finding of no flow.2 To
resolve this, an extracranial (internal carotid artery) examination was included
for diagnosing brain death. The aim of this study was to determine whether
incorporating the transorbital approach increased the sensitivity and specificity
of TCD in confirming brain death.
The results of the study demonstrated a positive pattern in all approaches,
with the transorbital approach showing 79%. The high percentage of no flow
in our study (5.5% in all approaches and 15% in the transtemporal approach)
can be explained by the inclusion of patients older than 90. Our patients
were 2 decades older compared with the mean age in studies reporting high
sensitivity.7, 10 Previous investigations
that included an older age sample demonstrated a higher percentage of no-flow
results, especially using the transtemporal approach.5
In our study, we also found a greater percentage of brain death patterns in
the anterior and posterior circulation systems using the transorbital approach,
increasing from 79% (45/57) to 88% (50/57), consistent with the definition
of brain death.2-3 Comparing the
percentage of positive patterns in at least one system, the percentage rose
from 89% (51/57) to 93% (53/57).
The significant differences among women with the transorbital approach
compared with the other approaches is consistent with the common finding of
a higher percentage of women with no-flow findings on the transtemporal approach,
reaching up to 10% to 15%, depending on age- and control-matched ethnicity.
This may suggest a greater importance in using the transorbital approach in
women. In addition, the inclusion of older patients in our study renders its
findings relevant to the question of organ donation for transplantation. Modern
medicine is increasingly unsure about its role at the end of life. Determination
of brain death will become more relevant as the population ages.
In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that the transorbital
approach may increase the efficacy of TCD in diagnosing brain death. The interobserver
coefficiency correlation was high, indicating that examination by only 2 observers
can confirm brain death in the case of generally decreased blood flow.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication September 4, 2001.
Author contributions: Study
concept and design (Dr Lampl); acquisition of data (Drs Lampl, Gilad, Eschel, Rapoport, and Sadeh); analysis and interpretation of data (Drs Lampl, Boaz, and Sadeh); drafting of the manuscript (Drs Lampl, Eschel, and Rapoport); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual
content (Drs Lampl, Gilad, Boaz, and Sadeh; statistical
expertise (Drs Lampl and Boaz); obtained funding (Drs Lampl, Gilad, and Sadeh); Administrative, technical,
and material support Drs Lampl. Eschel, Gilad, and Rapoport); study supervision (Dr Lampl).
We thank Judy Brandt for her skillful editing, word processing expertise,
and contributions.
Corresponding author and reprints: Yair Lampl, MD, Department of
Neurology, The E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon 58100, Israel.
From the Department of Neurology (Drs Lampl, Gilad, Eschel, Rapoport,
and Sadeh) and Human Biostatistics Institute (Dr Boaz), The E. Wolfson Medical
Center, Holon (Drs Lampl, Gilad, Eschel, Boaz, Rapoport, and Sadeh), and Sackler
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv (Drs Lampl, Gilad, Eschel,
Rapoport, and Sadeh), Israel.
REFERENCES
| |
1. Garcia OD, Roman JM. Redefining death: bioethical and theological implications. In: Machado C, ed. Brain Death. Amsterdam,
the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1995:110-135.
2. The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameters for determining brain death in adults [summary
statement]. Neurology. 1995;45:1012-1014.
ISI
| PUBMED
3. Canadian Neurocritical Care Group. Guidelines for the diagnosis of brain death. Can J Neurol Sci. 1999;26:64-66.
PUBMED
4. Ducrocq X, Hassler W, Moritake K, et al for the Task Force Group on cerebral death of the Neurosonology Research
Group of the World Federation of Neurology. Consensus opinion on diagnosis of cerebral circulatory arrest using
Doppler-sonography. J Neurol Sci. 1998;159:145-150.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
5. Feri M, Ralli L, Felici M, Vanni D, Capria V. Transcranial Doppler and brain death diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:1120-1126.
ISI
| PUBMED
6. Powers AD, Graeber MC, Smith RR. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in the determination of brain
death. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:884-889.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
7. Petty GW, Mohr JP, Pedley TA. The role of transcranial Doppler in confirming brain death: sensitivity,
specificity and suggestions for performance and interpretation. Neurology. 1990;40:300-303.
FREE FULL TEXT
8. Davalos A, Rodrigues R, Mate G, et al. Value of the transcranial Doppler examination in the diagnosis of brain
death. Med Clin (Barc). 1993;100:249-252.
9. Paolin A, Manvali A, DiPaola F, et al. Reliability in diagnosis of brain death. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21:657-662.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
10. Hadani M, Bruk B, Ram Z, Knoller N, Spiegelmann R, Segal E. Application of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis
of brain death. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:822-828.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2002;59(1):155-157.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Brief review: The role of ancillary tests in the neurological determination of death: [Revue sommaire : le role des tests accessoires dans la determination neurologique de la mort].
Young et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2006;53:620-627.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Brainstem death testing in the UK--time for reappraisal?{dagger}
Bell et al.
Br J Anaesth 2004;92:633-640.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Routine Insonation of the Transorbital Window for Confirming Brain Death: a Double-Edged Sword
de Freitas and Andre
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1169-1169.
FULL TEXT
Transcranial Doppler and Brain Death: Transorbital Method Useful
JWatch Neurology 2003;2003:10-10.
FULL TEXT
|
