 |
 |

Hereditary Neuropathy With Liability to Pressure Palsies Is Not a Major Cause of Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
David W. Stockton, MD;
Ricardo A. Meade, MD;
David T. Netscher, MD;
Michael J. Epstein, MD;
Saleh M. Shenaq, MD;
Lisa G. Shaffer, PhD;
James R. Lupski, MD, PhD
Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1635-1637.
ABSTRACT
Background Carpal tunnel syndrome is a debilitating neuropathy affecting millions
of individuals. Although there are published reports of familial associations
of carpal tunnel syndrome, the molecular mechanisms are unknown.
Objective To determine the prevalence and potential role of the chromosome 17
microdeletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure
palsies in patients diagnosed as having carpal tunnel syndrome.
Design Prospective study.
Patients and Methods Since hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies may present
as carpal tunnel syndrome, we evaluated 50 patients with idiopathic carpal
tunnel syndrome for hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies.
Results No hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies deletions
were detected.
Conclusion Molecular genetic testing for hereditary neuropathy with liability to
pressure palsies in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome is of
limited value.
INTRODUCTION
RECENT GENETIC and molecular studies have suggested conditions that
could either mimic the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or predispose
one to develop CTS.1, 2 A peripheral
neuropathy known as hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies
(HNPP) is one such condition. Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure
palsies most frequently manifests initially as a peripheral nerve entrapment,
including median nerve compression at the carpal canal with delayed nerve
conduction velocities.3 Potocki et al4 described a family with dominantly inherited CTS that
was associated with the chromosome deletion in 17p12 that causes HNPP. Hereditary
neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies is believed to be underdiagnosed
because it typically has episodic and transient clinical manifestations. The
association between idiopathic CTS and undiagnosed HNPP has been hypothesized
but untested.
We performed a prospective study to estimate the prevalence of HNPP
in the population of patients with CTS presenting for surgery. Our specific
hypothesis addressed the prevalence and potential role of the chromosome 17
microdeletion associated with HNPP in patients diagnosed as having CTS.
PATIENTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS
Fifty unrelated patients scheduled for carpal tunnel release were studied.
Diagnosis of CTS was made by both clinical evaluation and electrodiagnostic
study. Only individuals with idiopathic CTS sufficiently evaluated and severe
enough to need surgical release were included. Exclusion criteria consisted
of those with anatomical changes decreasing the available volume within the
carpal tunnel (eg, fractures or congenital anomalies), diagnoses that may
result in the increased size of the carpal canal contents (including amyloidosis,
rheumatoid arthritis, or edema), those diagnoses associated with soft tissue
impingement (ie, lipomas, hematomas, or urate crystal deposition), and other
causes of peripheral mononeuropathies such as diabetes mellitus. There were
no enrollment restrictions based on race, age, or sex. After informed consent
was obtained, a blood sample was transported in a heparin sodiumcontaining
vacuum container (Vacutainer) for fluorescence in situ hybridization testing
on interphase cells with a set of cosmids containing the PMP22 gene to detect the deletion associated with HNPP.5
RESULTS
Thirty female and 20 male patients diagnosed as having idiopathic CTS
were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 20 had CTS diagnosed in a
first-degree relative and 2 patients reported a first-degree relative with
other peripheral neuropathy symptoms. The patients' ages ranged from 18 to
76 years (mean age, 50.5 years). No PMP22 deletions
were detected. This predicts that the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval
for the prevalence of PMP22 deletions as a cause
of idiopathic CTS is around 6%.6
COMMENT
Predictive or susceptibility testing for CTS has the potential to save
millions of individuals the pain and suffering of this common debilitating
mononeuropathy. It also has the potential for discriminatory use by insurance
agencies and employers. To our knowledge, to date, there are no published
data to establish the validity of susceptibility testing for CTS.
Carpal tunnel syndrome has a reported population incidence of less than
1% to 3.8%.7, 8, 9
These cases require an estimated 400 000 to 500 000 carpal tunnel
releases in the United States at an annual cost of more than $2 billion.10 This recognized public health problem constitutes
3% of all Workmen's Compensation Insurance claims and has prompted consideration
of legislative limitations on tasks of repetitive motion or vibration exposure
in the workplace. These limitations would potentially be applied to workers
uniformly because of a lack of recognized criteria for identification of individuals
at increased risk.11, 12, 13
Carpal tunnel syndrome is routinely thought to be idiopathic and sporadic.
However, there are clearly susceptibility differences as evidenced by 2 individuals
doing identical tasks where one develops CTS and the other does not. Often,
when it is considered to be inherited, it is the manifestation of a systemic
illness.14 In the past, epidemiological studies
generally overlooked the possibility of familial occurrence.15
There are, however, multiple literature reports of familial CTS displaying
a dominant pattern of inheritance.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
One group reported idiopathic median nerve entrapment "inheritance" as familial
CTS and suggested it to be a genetically distinct disorder.17
Multiple claims of pedigrees of affected first-degree relatives in numerous
generations of families have been reported.22, 23, 24, 25
With current advances in genetic medicine, a much better understanding
of the molecular and cytogenetic causes of many disorders is known. Recent
cytogenetic and molecular studies have directly linked abnormalities of the
proximal short arm of chromosome 17 to the dominantly inherited peripheral
neuropathies HNPP and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A).26, 27 Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease is the
most common inherited peripheral neuropathy, estimated to occur at an incidence
of 1 per 2500 persons.28 The disease-causing
mechanism in most patients with CMT1A and HNPP has been identified as a 1.5-megabase
DNA duplication and its reciprocal 1.5-megabase deletion, respectively.29, 30, 31 Although the true
incidence of HNPP is unknown, the frequency of new mutations in HNPP is expected
to be similar to CMT1A given the shared mutational mechanism.27
The submicroscopic duplications or deletions can be assayed by several techniques5, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35;
2-color fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of interphase nuclei,
however, is very specific, sensitive, relatively inexpensive, and simple to
interpret.
Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies is also known
as "tomaculous neuropathy." It manifests transient episodes of numbness, muscular
weakness, and atrophy after minor compression or trauma to peripheral nerves
in addition to symptoms normally associated with entrapment neuropathies.
Affected patients and asymptomatic carriers have mildly slowed nerve conduction
velocities with conduction block. Segmental demyelination and remyelination
with tomacula or sausage-like focal thickening of the myelin sheaths are observed
on peripheral nerve biopsy specimens.26 Carpal
tunnel syndrome may be the first or only manifestation of HNPP,4, 36
Potocki et al4 described a patient who had
a duplication of a region of 17p11.2 and a deletion of 17p12 encompassing PMP22 on the homologous chromosome. Further molecular analyses
revealed the duplication to be a de novo event, but the deletion containing PMP22 deletion was familial. Three generations of family
members with PMP22 deletions had dominant CTS, documented
by electrodiagnostic testing prior to molecular analysis.4
The identification of the chromosome 17p12 deletion in this family was incidental
to the evaluation of developmental delay in a family member.
The prevalence of HNPP in idiopathic CTS is unknown. With the estimated
incidences of CTS (1%-3.8%)7, 8, 9
and HNPP (0.04%),28 HNPP could be responsible
for 1% to 4% of CTS. The results of this clinical survey of 50 patients, however,
found that no patients with idiopathic CTS had the 1.5-megabase HNPP-associated
deletion.
Making the diagnosis of HNPP as the cause of the CTS in these patients
could have significant health consequences for individuals and their family
members by avoiding unnecessary surgical release of the carpal canal and promoting
preventive measures to avoid nerve pressure or trauma in areas such as the
fibular neck in the legs, the elbows, and at the wrists. Hereditary neuropathy
with liability to pressure palsies should be suspected and testing considered
in all patients with a history of multiple transient mononeuropathies or any
family showing dominantly inherited pressure palsies as well as those in which
multiple members are affected with CTS or other entrapment neuropathies. The
contribution of HNPP to isolated CTS is likely to be relatively small, thus
continued screening for PMP22 deletion in patients
with idiopathic CTS in the absence of any other clinical signs of HNPP is
of limited clinical value.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication May 23, 2001.
We thank Catherine Kashork and Jessica Wu, from the Baylor College of
Medicine, for their expert fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses.
From the Departments of Molecular and Human Genetics (Drs Stockton,
Shaffer, and Lupski), Medicine (Dr Stockton), Ophthalmology (Dr Stockton),
and Pediatrics (Dr Lupski) and the Division of Plastic Surgery (Drs Meade,
Netscher, Epstein, and Shenaq), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex,
and the Division of Plastic Surgery Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston
(Dr Netscher).
Reprints: David W. Stockton, MD, One Baylor Plaza, Room 604B, Houston,
TX 77030 (e-mail: stockton{at}bcm.tmc.edu).
REFERENCES
 |  |
1. Lupski JR. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a gene-dosage effect. Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1997;32:83-122.
2. Bonnici AV, Birjandi F, Spencer JD, Fox SP, Berry AC. Chromosomal abnormalities in Dupuytren's contracture and carpal tunnel
syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1992;17:349-355.
FULL TEXT
| PUBMED
3. Chance PF. Overview of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;883:14-21.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
4. Potocki L, Chen K-S, Koeuth T, et al. DNA rearrangements on both homologues of chromosome 17 in a mildly
delayed individual with a family history of autosomal dominant carpal tunnel
syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:471-478.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
5. Shaffer LG, Kennedy GM, Spikes AS, Lupski JR. Diagnosis of CMT1A duplications and HNPP deletions by interphase FISH:
implications for testing in the cytogenetics laboratory. Am J Med Genet. 1997;69:325-331.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
6. Newman TB. If almost nothing goes wrong, is almost everything all right? interpreting
small numerators. JAMA. 1995;274:1013.
7. Tanaka S, Wild DK, Seligman PJ, Behrens V, Cameron L, Putz-Anderson V. The US prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome: 1988 National
Health Interview Survey data. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1846-1848.
FREE FULL TEXT
8. Stevens JC, Sun S, Beard CM, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980. Neurology. 1988;38:134-138.
FREE FULL TEXT
9. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282:153-158.
FREE FULL TEXT
10. Palmer DH, Hanrahan LP. Social and economic costs of carpal tunnel surgery. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:167-172.
PUBMED
11. Delgrosso I, Boillat MA. Carpal tunnel syndrome: role of occupation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63:267-270.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
12. Atcheson SG. Carpal tunnel syndrome: is it work-related? Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1999;34:49-56.
13. Belmonte K. Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1996;8:511-517.
PUBMED
14. Gossett JG, Chance PF. Is there a familial carpal tunnel syndrome? an evaluation and literature
review. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:1533-1536.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
15. Radecki P. The familial occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1994;17:325-330.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
16. Stoll C, Maitrot D. Autosomal dominant carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Genet. 1998;54:345-348.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
17. Leifer D, Cros D, Halperin JJ, Gallico GG, Pierce DS, Shahani BT. Familial bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: report of two famlies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:393-397.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
18. Michaud LJ, Hays RM, Dudgeon BJ, Kropp RJ. Congenital carpal tunnel syndrome: case report of autosomal dominant
inheritance and review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:430-432.
ISI
| PUBMED
19. Vadasz AG, Chance PF, Epstein LG, Lou J-S. Familial autosomal-dominant carpal tunnel syndrome presenting in a
5-year-old-case report and review of the literature. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:376-378.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
20. Golik A, Modai D, Pervin R, Marcus E-L, Fried K. Autosomal dominant carpal tunnel syndrome in a Karaite family. Isr J Med Sci. 1988;24:295-297.
ISI
| PUBMED
21. McDonnell JM, Makley JT, Horwitz SJ. Familial carpal-tunnel syndrome presenting in childhood: report of
two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:928-930.
FREE FULL TEXT
22. Vanwijck R, Bouillenne C. HL-A and carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 1986;5:379-381.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
23. Braddom RL. Familial carpal tunnel syndrome in three generations of a black family. Am J Phys Med. 1985;64:227-234.
ISI
| PUBMED
24. Swoboda KJ, Engle EC, Scheindlin B, Anthony DC, Jones HR. Mutilating hand syndrome in an infant with famlial carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:104-111.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
25. Zammarchi E, Savelli A, Donati MA, Pasquini E. Self-mutilation in a patient with mucolipidosis III. Pediatr Neurol. 1994;11:68-70.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
26. Murakami T, Garcia CA, Reiter LT, Lupski JR. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related inherited neuropathies. Medicine (Baltimore). 1996;75:233-250.
FULL TEXT
| PUBMED
27. Lupski JR, Chance PF, Garcia CA. Inherited primary peripheral neuropathies: molecular genetics and clinical
implications of CMT1A and HNPP. JAMA. 1993;270:2326-2330.
FREE FULL TEXT
28. Skre H. Genetic and clinical aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth's disease. Clin Genet. 1974;6:98-118.
ISI
| PUBMED
29. Chance PF, Abbas N, Lensch MW, et al. Two autosomal dominant neuropathies result from reciprocal DNA duplication/deletion
of a region on chromosome 17. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:223-228.
FREE FULL TEXT
30. Lupski JR, Montes de Oca-Luna R, Slaugenhaupt S, et al. DNA duplication associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Cell. 1991;66:219-232.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
31. Lupski JR. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: lessons in genetic mechanisms. Mol Med. 1998;4:3-11.
ISI
| PUBMED
32. Pentao L, Wise CA, Chinault AC, Patel PI, Lupski JR. Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A duplication appears to arise from recombination
at repeat sequences flanking the 1.5 Mb monomer unit. Nat Genet. 1992;2:292-300.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
33. Chance PF, Alderson MK, Leppig KA, et al. DNA deletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to
pressure palsies. Cell. 1993;72:143-151.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
34. Blair IP, Kennerson ML, Nicholson GA. Detection of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A duplication by the polymerase
chain reaction. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1105-1108.
FREE FULL TEXT
35. Lupski JR. DNA diagnostics for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related inherited
neuropathies. Clin Chem. 1996;42:995-998.
FREE FULL TEXT
36. Martinez AC, Arpa J. Carpal tunnel syndrome in childhood: study of 6 cases. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1998;109:304-308.
FULL TEXT
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2001;58(10):1712-1714.
FULL TEXT
|