 |
 |

Hypointense Lesions on T1-Weighted Spin-Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Relation to Clinical Characteristics in Subgroups of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Marianne A. A. van Walderveen, MD;
Geert J. Lycklama à Nijeholt, MD;
Herman J. Adèr, PhD;
Peter J. H. Jongen, MD;
Chris H. Polman, MD;
Jonas A. Castelijns, MD;
Frederik Barkhof, MD
Arch Neurol. 2001;58:76-81.
ABSTRACT
 |  |
Context Hypointense lesions on T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic resonance images
(T1 lesions) represent destructive multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, consisting
of axonal loss and matrix destruction. These lesions are being used as a secondary
outcome measure in phase III clinical trials. Clinical determinants of T1
lesions may differ between subgroups of patients with MS and subsequently
may have implications for the selection of patients for clinical trials.
Objective To determine if clinical characteristics of patients with MS are related
to T1 lesion volume.
Design A survey of 138 patients with MS (52 with relapsing-remitting MS, 44
with secondary progressive MS, and 42 with primary progressive MS).
Setting The Magnetic Resonance Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research, University
Hospital "Vrije Universiteit," Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Main Outcome Measures Type of MS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, sex, age
at first symptoms, and T1 lesion volume.
Results Patients with secondary progressive MS have the highest T1 lesion volume.
Patients with relapsing-remitting MS have a lower T1/T2 ratio than patients
with secondary progressive MS and patients with primary progressive MS. In
patients with relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS, T1 lesion
volume relates to disease duration and EDSS score, while in patients with
primary progressive MS sex is important. A trend toward higher T1 lesion volume
was shown for male patients with primary progressive MS when compared with
female patients with primary progressive MS (1.0 cm3 vs 0.3 cm3, P= .03); a trend toward higher T1 lesion volume was
found with age at onset in patients with relapsing-remitting MS and in patients
with primary progressive MS.
Conclusions In patients with MS different clinical characteristics associate with
T1 lesion volume, suggesting a more destructive type of lesions in certain
subgroups. A possible sex difference in (destructive) lesion development on
magnetic resonance imaging should be evaluated in more detail, preferably
in a cohort.
INTRODUCTION
CHANGE in hypointense lesion load on T1-weighted magnetic resonance
images (MRIs) (T1 lesions ) is recommended as a secondary outcome measure
in definitive (phase III) clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS).1 This is based on the observation that T1 lesion volume
correlates more strongly with clinical disability in patients with MS than
does the overall lesion volume on T2-weighted MRIs (T2 lesions).2, 3, 4
The histopathologic correlate of T1 lesions includes axonal loss and matrix
destruction; implying that in vivo monitoring of progressive tissue destruction
may be possible.5, 6, 7
A recent study showed that increase in T1 lesion volume relates more
strongly to baseline T1 lesion volume in patients with relapsing-remitting
(RR) MS and in patients with secondary progressive (SP) MS than to the degree
of inflammatory activity seen on MRIs.8 Thus,
while in some patients new lesions remain hypointense on T1-weighted MRIs
(and probably have axonal damage), in other patients lesions remain or become
isointense, indicating a more favorable outcome.9
This suggests that some patients with MS may be genetically prone to develop
destructive lesions. A combination ofso far unknowngenetic factors
may well be reflected in certain clinical characteristics of patients with
MS. The frequency of blood-brain barrier disruption on contrast-enhanced MRI
has already been shown to correlate with an earlier age at onset and a more
aggressive disease course in patients with RR MS10, 11
or SP MS,12 supporting the rationale of early
treatment in MS and MRI monitoring of the effect of treatment. Obtaining the
same sort of information for T1 lesions would be of similar value when evaluating
prognosis and treatment efficacy in patients with MS.
Primary progressive (PP) MS is considered a distinct entity, with a
degree of cerebral pathology comparable to that of patients with RR MS although
the degree of disability compares with patients with SP MS.13
Clinical determinants of T1 lesions in this group of patients may well differ
from those with RR MS or SP MS.
The objective of this study was to establish clinical determinants of
T1 lesions in subgroups of patients with MS. The hypothesis is that T1 lesions
are more frequent in late or more aggressive disease, reflecting an exhaustion
of repair mechanisms that results in axonal loss.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
PATIENTS
One hundred thirty-eight patients with clinically definite MS14 were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the
Department of Neurology, University Hospital "Vrije Universiteit,"Amsterdam,
the Netherlands. Informed consent was obtained from each patient after the
nature of the procedures had been explained. Clinical evaluation consisted
of assessment of the duration of the disease (ie, the interval between the
date of first symptoms and the date of examination [measured in years]), patient's
age at first symptoms, disease course,15 and
the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score.16
Fifty-two patients had RR MS, 44 patients SP MS, and 42 patients PP MS.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Brain MRI was performed at 1.0 T (Magnetom Impact; Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany) and consisted of postcontrast (0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium-DTPA [diethylenetriamine
pentaacetic acid dimeglumine]) spin-echo (2300/45, 90/1 [repetition time/echo
time/excitations]) and T1-weighted spin-echo series (600/15/2 [repetition
time/echo time/excitations]). Twenty-one axial slices with an in-plane resolution
of 1 mm, slice thickness of 5 mm, and an interslice gap of 0.5 mm, were obtained.
DATA ANALYSIS
Hypointense lesions on T1-weighted spin-echo MRI and hyperintense lesions
on T2-weighted spine-echo MRI were analyzed and marked on hard copies (M.A.A.W.,
G.J.L.à N.). T1 lesions were defined as regions with a signal intensity
similar to or reduced to the signal intensity of gray matter and corresponding
to a hyperintense region on T2-weighted MRI. HyperintenseT2 lesions
were defined as sharply demarcated regions of high signal intensity compared
with surrounding brain tissue. All data were transferred to a computer (Sparc
5; SUN, Palo Alto, Calif). A single observer, using home-developed, semiautomated
local thresholding software, quantified the areas of previously identified
brain lesions. T1 and T2 lesion volumes (in cubic centimeters) were calculated
by adding the area of all lesions multiplied by interslice distance.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The median and (interquartile) range were used to describe clinical
and MRI characteristics for subgroups of patients. Since RR MS and SP MS may
be considered as 2 phases of the same disease, analyses were also performed
for the subgroup of patients with RR and SP MS.
The Mann-Whitney test was used to test for differences in the T1 and
T2 lesion volumes between men and women; between patients with mild disability
(EDSS score, 2.5) and moderate to severe disability (EDSS score, >3.0);
and between patients whose age at first symptoms was 25 years or younger or
older than 25 years (cutoff levels based on findings in the literature).17, 18, 19 In patients with
SP MS and PP MS, few patients had mild disability and patients were therefore
reclassified with those with an EDSS score of 5.5 or less and an EDSS score
greater than 6.0 (this level of disability is obvious since patients need
support to walk) to provide a homogeneous division. In patients with PP MS
the first symptoms usually occur at an older age. In our study only 3 patients
experienced their first symptoms when they were aged 25 years or younger;
patients with PP MS, therefore, were classified with those who were 39 years
or younger at first symptoms and with those who were older than 40 years at
first symptoms to provide a homogeneous division.
Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship
between T1 and T2 lesion volume and the clinical characteristics in the subgroup
of patients. A forward stepwise procedure was used to find out which clinical
characteristics were most influential (probability of F to enter, .05), the
residuals of the final models were tested for normality. Average T1 and T2
lesion volume were transformed to a natural logarithmic scale (ln [T1 lesion
volume + 10] and ln [T2 lesion volume + 10]) to satisfy the assumptions underlying
regression analysis. Independent variables included were age at first symptoms
before or after the age of 25 years, EDSS score (high or low disability scores),
sex, and disease duration. Age at first symptoms before or after the age of
40 years was used as an independent variable in patients with PP MS, and the
cutoff level for EDSS scores was 5.5 in patients with PP MS or SP MS.
A Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) was used to determine the associations between MRI parameters and
clinical characteristics. To correct for multiple comparisons, a 2-sided significance
level of P .01 was considered statistically significant
and a P value between .01 and .05 was considered
a trend.
RESULTS
Clinical (Table 1) and MRI
characteristics (Table 2) of the
patients are listed. T1 and T2 lesion volumes were significantly (P<.01) higher in patients with SP MS compared with patients with
RR MS or PP MS. A trend toward a higher ratio of T1 lesion volume over T2
lesion volume (T1/T2 ratio) was found in patients with SP MS compared with
patients with RR MS(P = .03). The T1/T2 ratio in
patients with PP MS was similar to that in patients with SP MS, but not significantly
different from the T1/T2 ratio in patients with RR MS. Since a large variance
in T1 lesion volume is present between the subgroups of patients with MS,
only subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical characteristics
of T1 lesions.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Clinical Data Classified by Clinical Disease Course*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics Classified by Clinical
Disease Course*
|
|
|
Table 3 gives the T1 lesion
volume for patients with RR MS, SP MS, and PP MS. A division has been made
according to sex, level of disability, and age at first symptoms. A similar
division has been made for T2 lesion volume and the T1/T2 ratio (data are
described).
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Hypointense T1Lesion Volume, Subdivided According to
Patient Characteristics for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting (RR), Secondary
Progressive (SP), and Primary Progressive (PP) Multiple Sclerosis (MS)*
|
|
|
SEX
In patients with RR MS, SP MS, or RR and SP MS no statistically significant
differences in T1 lesion volume, T2 lesion volume, or T1/T2 ratio were noted
between male or female patients. In patients with PP MS, a trend toward a
higher T1 lesion volume (1.0 vs 0.3, P = .03) and
a higher T1/T2 ratio (0.22 vs. 0.08, P = .02) was
shown for male patients compared with female patients.
LEVEL OF DISABILITY
In patients with RR MS, the difference in T1 lesion volume (0.2 cm3 vs 0.7 cm3), T2 lesion volume (4.0 cm3 vs 6.8
cm3), and T1/T2 ratio (0.08 vs 0.07) was not statistically significant
between patients with an EDSS score of 2.5 or less or patients with an EDSS
score higher than 3.0. Patients with SP MS who had an EDSS score higher than
6.0 did not differ significantly from those who had an EDSS score of 5.5 or
less for T1 lesion volume (2.1 cm3 vs 1.1 cm3), T2 lesion
volume (12.9 cm3 vs 7.0 cm3), or T1/T2 ratio (0.19 vs
0.12). In patients with PP MS, the T1 lesion volume did not differ between
patients with an EDSS score of 5.5 or less (0.4 cm3) and an EDSS
score higher than 6.0 (0.3 cm3); also no differences were present
in T2 lesion volume or T1/T2 ratio.
AGE AT FIRST SYMPTOMS
In patients with RR MS, a trend toward a higher T1 lesion volume (0.3
cm3 vs 0.0 cm3, P = .02) and
a higher T1/T2 ratio (0.09 vs 0.0, P = .03) was found
for patients who had their first symptoms after the age of 25 years. No difference
was shown for T2 lesion volume.
In contrast, a trend toward a higher T1 lesion volume was found (3.2
cm3 vs 0.8 cm3; P = .03) in
patients with SP MS who had their first symptom before the age of 25 years.
T2 lesion volume was higher for patients with an earlier onset of disease
(15.3 cm3 vs 10.2 cm3, P =
.06), but not significantly. No difference in T1/T2 ratio was present (0.21
vs 0.12, P = .1). For patients with RR and SP MS,
no difference in MRI parameters was present regarding age at onset.
A trend toward a significant difference in T1 lesion volume (0.1 cm3 vs 0.6 cm3, P = .04) and in T1/T2
ratio (0.04 vs 0.17, P = .02) was shown between patients
with PP MS who were aged 39 years or younger at the onset of first symptoms
compared with those who were aged older than 40 years at the onset of first
symptoms. No significant difference was present for T2 lesion volume (2.5
cm3 vs 4.3 cm3, P = .7).
MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
In the subgroups with RR MS, no meaningful model could be found. A weak
model (R2 = 0.16) was present in patients
with SP MS, including being younger than 25 years at the onset of first symptoms
as a variable (ß = -0.40). In patients with RR and SP MS, a model
with R2 = 0.19 was found including disease
duration (ß = 0.28; P = .008) and EDSS score
(ß = 0.24; P = .02). In patients with PP MS,
sex (ß = 0.40, P = .008) was the only variable
included in the model (R2 = 0.16), indicating a higher preponderance
of T1 lesions in male patients with PP MS. All patients showed abnormalities
on T2-weighted MRI. Multiple regression analysis did not show a meaningful
model in patients with RR MS or PP MS; in patients with SP MS age at first
symptoms younger than 25 years was the only variable contributing to T2 lesion
volume (ß = -0.33; P = .03). In patients
with RR and SP MS, EDSS score (ß = 0.35; P<.01)
was included in the model (R2 = 0.12).
In all models, there was no reason to doubt the normality of the residual
distribution.
CORRELATIONS
In patients with RR MS, a trend toward significant correlation was found
between age at first symptoms and T1 lesion volume (rs = 0.34, P = .02), whereas age at first symptoms
correlated significantly with, T1/T2 ratio (rs = 0.42, P<.01); T2 lesion volume did not
correlate with any clinical parameter. In patients with SP MS, a trend toward
significant correlation was shown between T1 lesion volume and disease duration
(rs = 0.34, P
= .03) and age at first symptoms (rs = -0.31, P = .04), and between T2 lesion volume and disease duration
(rs = 0.33, P
= .03) and age at first symptoms (rs = -0.32, P = .04), disease duration being interrelated with age
at first symptoms (rs = 0.49, P = .001) and EDSS score (rs =
0.43, P<.01). No correlation was found for T1/T2
ratio.
When patients with RR MS and SP MS were grouped together, T1 lesion
volume correlated with EDSS score (rs
= 0.32, P = .001), and with disease duration (rs = 0.33, P = .001),
disease duration again being interrelated with EDSS score (rs = 0.41, P<.001) and age at
first symptoms (rs = - 0.31, P = .002). T2 lesion volume correlated with EDSS score
(rs = 0.34, P
= .001). A trend toward significant correlation was shown between disease
duration and T2 lesion volume (rs = 0.24, P = .02) andT1/T2 ratio (rs = 0.23, P = .03). In patients with PP MS,
T1 or T2 lesion volume did not correlate with any clinical parameter although
a trend toward a significant correlation was found between T1/T2 ratio and
age at first symptoms (rs = 0.33, P = .04).
COMMENT
Previous reports examining T1 lesions in patients with MS have been
based on small longitudinal studies with a limited range of disabilities.4, 5 To our knowledge, this is the first
large cross-sectional examination of the relationship of a range of clinical
characteristics of patients with MS (including a range of EDSS scores, 0-7.5)
to T1 lesion volumes. The clinical characteristics of the patients in this
study are typical andexcept for the female preponderance in patients
with PP MSin line with previous reports, suggesting that the sample
under consideration is more or less representative of patients with RR MS,
SP MS, and PP MS in general and that no selection bias (eg, selection of patients
with extraordinary disease courses or with high EDSS scores) has occurred.
Patients with PP MS develop fewer T2 lesions in the brain and have a
lower frequency of MRIdetected inflammatory lesions compared with patients
with SP MS, although their EDSS scores are often comparable.13, 20, 21
Compared with patients with RR MS, patients with PP MS have less histologically
demonstrable inflammation22 and an often poor
response to immunosuppressive drugs.23 We show
that T1 lesion volume in patients with PP MS is small and comparable with
patients with RR MS. This is in line with previous observations that patients
with PP MS develop lesions preponderantly in the spinal cord, involving both
focal and diffuse abnormalities.13 The T1/T2
ratio is higher in patients with PP MS and SP MS than in patients with RR
MS indicating that a progressive disease course is characterized by a high
proportion of brain lesions being or becoming hypointense on T1-weighted MRI.
Disease duration and EDSS score are the main clinical determinants of
T1 lesion volume in patients with RR and SP MS; in the subgroup of patients
with SP MS age at first symptoms before 25 years appeared to be most important
(and correlates with disease duration). Apparently, our initial hypothesis
of T1 lesions being more frequent in late and more aggressive disease is correct
for patients with RR and SP MS. In subgroups of patients with RR and SP MS,
T1 lesion volume does not differ significantly between patients with mild
disability or with moderate to severe disability. This may be due to a combination
of factors. Patients with RR MS showed little variance in EDSS scores (in
our study only 10 patients were included with an EDSS score >3.0) in addition
to limited variance in T1 lesion volume (18 patients [35%] did not show any
lesion on T1-weighted MRI). In patients with SP MS, the opposite holds true,
only 4 patients having an EDSS score of 2.5 or less. After reclassifying patients
with SP MS with those who had EDSS scores below or above 6.0, patients with
severe disability showed more lesions on T1-weighted MRI, but the values were
not statistically significant. These circumstances may have contributed to
the lack of a correlation between EDSS and T1 lesion volume in individual
subgroups, also shown by others,24, 25
since a correlation was present when patients with RR MS and SP MS were grouped
together. Further, involvement of normal-appearing white matter,26, 27, 28
atrophy of brain and spinal cord,12, 29
and perhaps even a chronic "low-grade" inflammation of the whole brain30 may all have contributedin addition to T1
lesionsto disability to some extent in this subgroup of patients.
In patients with RR and PP MS, a trend toward a higher T1 lesion volume
was found for patients who have their first symptoms after the age of 25 (or
40) years. This result agrees with clinical studies, showing that an older
age at onset relates to a more unfavorable outcome.19, 31, 32, 33, 34
Apart from the higher chance of following a progressive disease course from
onset, patients with RR MS have an increased risk of a rapid shift to the
SP phase and the time to reach EDSS score of 6.0 tends to be shorter31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
A contradictory trend was assessed in patients with SP MS, suggesting that
in this clinical subgroup, accumulation of T1 lesions is a consequence of
longer disease duration and the age at which the first symptoms occur cannot
be used as a prognostic indicator.
We showed a trend toward higher T1 lesion volume (and a higher T1/T2
ratio) in male patients with PP MS compared with female patients with PP MS.
Previous studies have shown that, in general, male patients with MS are prone
to have a more unfavorable clinical outcome than female patients,18, 35, 36, 40, 41
although other studies have failed to detect a sex difference in the rate
of clinical disease progression.17, 37, 38
Experimental studies emphasize that expression of autoimmune diseases differs
between male and female patients, possibly related to susceptibility modulation
by the sex hormonesestrogen, progesterone, and testosterone.42 Estriol treatment has been shown to reduce the severity
of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in an animal model of MS, whereas
treatment with progesterone did not yield a substantial effect.43
Also, inflammatory activity on MRI has been shown to relate to the estrogen-progesterone
ratio; a low ratio appeared to diminish the number of active lesions on MRI.44, 45 Preliminary results of the clinical
trial with interferon beta-1a (Rebif) in SP MS indicate that the response
to treatment may differ according to sex (Lance D. Blumhardt, oral communication,
June 5-9, 1999, at the European Neurological Society's Ninth meeting); remarkably,
females, who according to our observations may develop less destructive lesions,
responded better to treatment in this study. Our observation of a possible
sex difference in T1 lesion volume in patients with PP MS is in line with
these observations and should be evaluated in more detail in other longitudinal
studies, preferably in relation to other MRI parameters such as spinal cord
pathologic features, enhancing lesion rate, and development of atrophy.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication May 24, 2000.
The Dutch Magnetic Resonance Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research
is supported by Stichting Vrienden Multiple Sclerosis Research, the Hague,
the Netherlands, and University Hospital "Vrije Universiteit," and the Medical
Faculty of the "Vrije Universiteit," Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Dr van Walderveen
is recipient of grant 95-245 from Stichting Vrienden Multiple Sclerosis Research.
We thank Arno Kuijper, MD, for helping with quantitation of brain abnormalities.
From the Magnetic Resonance Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research
(Drs van Walderveen, Lycklama à Nijeholt, Polman, Castelijns, and Barkhof)
and the Departments of Radiology (Drs van Walderveen, Lycklama à Nijeholt,
Castelijns, and Barkhof) and Neurology (Dr Polman), University Hospital "Vrije
Universiteit," Amsterdam; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
(Dr Adèr), Free University, Amsterdam; and the Stichting Multiple Sclerose
Centrum, Nijmegen (Dr Jongen), the Netherlands.
Corresponding author and reprints: Marianne A. A. van Walderveen,
MD, Magnetic Resonance Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research, University
Hospital "Vrije Universiteit," PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
(e-mail: m.vanwalderveen{at}azvu.nl).
REFERENCES
 |  |
1. Miller DH, Albert PS, Barkhof F, et al. Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring
the treatment of multiple sclerosis: US National MS Society Task Force. Ann Neurol. 1996;39:6-16.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
2. Iannucci G, Minicucci L, Rodegher M, Sormani MP, Comi G, Filippi M. Correlations between clinical and MRI involvement in multiple sclerosis:
assessment using T(1), T(2) and MT histograms. J Neurol Sci. 1999;171:121-129.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
3. van Walderveen MA, Barkhof F, Hommes OR, et al. Correlating MRI and clinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis:
relevance of hypointense lesions on short-TR/short-TE (T1-weighted) spin-echo
images. Neurology. 1995;45:1684-1690.
FREE FULL TEXT
4. Truyen L, van Waesberghe JH, van Walderveen MA, et al. Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T1 spin-echo
MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1996;47:1469-1476.
FREE FULL TEXT
5. van Walderveen MA, Kamphorst W, Scheltens P, et al. Histopathologic correlate of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted spin-echo
MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1998;50:1282-1288.
FREE FULL TEXT
6. Bruck W, Bitsch A, Kolenda H, Bruck Y, Stiefel M, Lassmann H. Inflammatory central nervous system demyelination: correlation of magnetic
resonance imaging findings with lesion pathology. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:783-793.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
7. van Waesberghe JH, Kamphorst W, De Groot CJ, et al. Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging
insights into substrates of disability. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:747-754.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
8. van Walderveen MA, Truyen L, van Oosten BW, et al. Development of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted spin-echo magnetic
resonance images in multiple sclerosis: relation to inflammatory activity. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:345-351.
FREE FULL TEXT
9. van Waesberghe JH, van Walderveen MA, Castelijns JA, et al. Patterns of lesion development in multiple sclerosis: longitudinal
observations using T1-weighted spin-echo and magnetization transfer MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:675-683.
ABSTRACT
10. Smith ME, Stone LA, Albert PS, et al. Clinical worsening in multiple sclerosis is associated with increased
frequency and area of gadopentetate dimeglumineenhancing magnetic resonance
imaging lesions. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:480-489.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
11. Stone LA, Smith ME, Albert PS, et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption on contrast-enhanced MRI in patients
with mild relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: relationship to course,
gender, and age. Neurology. 1995;45:1122-1126.
ABSTRACT
12. Losseff NA, Kingsley DP, McDonald WI, Miller DH, Thompson AJ. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging predictors of disability in
primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 1996;1:218-222.
PUBMED
13. Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MAA, Castelijns JA, et al. Brain and spinal cord abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: correlation
between MRI parameters, clinical subtypes and symptoms. Brain. 1998;121:687-697.
FREE FULL TEXT
14. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research
protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:227-231.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
15. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international
survey: National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical
Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 1996;46:907-911.
FREE FULL TEXT
16. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability
Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444-1452.
FREE FULL TEXT
17. Trojano M, Avolio C, Manzari C, et al. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of multiple sclerosis course
with a validated method to assess clinical events. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58:300-306.
FREE FULL TEXT
18. Levic ZM, Dujmovic I, Pekmezovic T, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 1999;5:171-178.
FREE FULL TEXT
19. Miller DH, Hornabrook RW, Purdie G. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a regional study with some
longitudinal data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:341-346.
FREE FULL TEXT
20. van Walderveen MA, Barkhof F, Tas MW, et al. Patterns of brain magnetic resonance abnormalities on T2-weighted spin
echo images in clinical subgroups of multiple sclerosis: a large cross-sectional
study. Eur Neurol. 1998;40:91-98.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
21. Stevenson VL, Miller DH, Rovaris M, et al. Primary and transitional progressive MS: a clinical and MRI cross-sectional
study. Neurology. 1999;52:839-845.
FREE FULL TEXT
22. Kidd D, Revez TR, Thompson AJ, et al. A comparative clinicopathological study of progressive multiple sclerosis
(abstract). Ann Neurol. 1993;34:308.
23. Weiner HL, Mackin GA, Orav EJ, et al. Intermittent cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in progressive multiple
sclerosis: final report of the Northeast Cooperative Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
Group. Neurology. 1993;43:910-918.
FREE FULL TEXT
24. O'Riordan JI, Gawne Cain M, Coles A, et al. T1 hypointense lesion load in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis:
a comparison of pre versus post contrast loads and of manual versus semi automated
threshold techniques for lesion segmentation. Mult Scler. 1998;4:408-412.
FREE FULL TEXT
25. Guigni E, Pozzilli C, Bastianello S, et al. MRI measures and their relations with clinical disability in relapsing-remitting
and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 1997;3:221-225.
ISI
| PUBMED
26. Werring DJ, Clark CA, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter
in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1999;52:1626-1632.
FREE FULL TEXT
27. Davie CA, Barker GJ, Webb S, et al. Persistent functional deficit in multiple sclerosis and autosomal dominant
cerebellar ataxia is associated with axonal loss. Brain. 1995;118:1583-1592.
FREE FULL TEXT
28. Fu L, Mathews PM, De Stefano N, et al. Imaging axonal damage of normal-appearing white matter in multiple
sclerosis. Brain. 1998;121:103-113.
FREE FULL TEXT
29. Losseff NA, Wang L, Lai HM, et al. Progressive cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a serial MRI study. Brain. 1996;119:2009-2019.
FREE FULL TEXT
30. Silver NC, Tofts PS, Symms MR, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Evidence of widespread subtle blood-brain barrier dysfunction associated
with progressive MS (abstract). Proc Soc Magn Reson Med. 1999;7:628.
31. Phadke JG. Clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis in north-east Scotland with
particular reference to its course and prognosis. Brain. 1990;113:1597-1628.
FREE FULL TEXT
32. Phadke JG. Survival pattern and cause of death in patients with multiple sclerosis:
results from an epidemiological survey in north east Scotland. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50:523-531.
FREE FULL TEXT
33. Poser S, Raun NE, Poser W. Age at onset, initial symptomatology and the course of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1982;66:355-362.
ISI
| PUBMED
34. Visscher BR, Liu KS, Clark VA, Detels R, Malmgren RM, Dudley JP. Onset symptoms as predictors of mortality and disability in multiple
sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1984;70:321-328.
ISI
| PUBMED
35. Weinshenker BG, Rice GP, Noseworthy JH, Carriere W, Baskerville J, Ebers GC. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study,
3: multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome. Brain. 1991;114:1045-1056.
FREE FULL TEXT
36. Weinshenker BG. The natural history of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(suppl):S6-S11.
37. Confavreux C, Aimard G, Devic M. Course and prognosis of multiple sclerosis assessed by the computerized
data processing of 349 patients. Brain. 1980;103:281-300.
FREE FULL TEXT
38. Riise T, Grønning M, Fernández O, et al. Early prognostic factors for disability in multiple sclerosis, a European
multicenter study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;85:212-218.
ISI
| PUBMED
39. Thompson AJ, Hutchinson M, Brazil J, Feighery C, Martin EA. A clinical and laboratory study of benign multiple sclerosis. Q J Med. 1968;58:69-80.
40. Wolfson C, Confavreux C. Improvements to a simple Markov model of the natural history of multiple
sclerosis, 1: short-term prognosis. Neuroepidemiology. 1987;6:101-115.
PUBMED
41. Runmarker B, Andersen O. Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with twenty-five
years of follow-up. Brain. 1993;116:117-134.
FREE FULL TEXT
42. Whitacre CC, Reingold SC, O'Looney PA. A gender gap in autoimmunity. Science. 1999;283:1277-1278.
FREE FULL TEXT
43. Kim S, Liva SM, Dalal MA, Verity MA, Voskuhl RR. Estriol ameliorates autoimmune demyelinating disease: implication for
multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1999;52:1230-1238.
FREE FULL TEXT
44. Bansil S, Lee HJ, Jindal S, Holtz CR, Cook SD. Correlation between sex hormones and magnetic resonance imaging lesions
in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;99:91-94
ISI
| PUBMED
45. Pozzilli C, Falaschi P, Mainero C, et al. MRI in multiple sclerosis during the menstrual cycle: relationship
with sex hormone patterns. Neurology. 1999;53:622-624.
FREE FULL TEXT
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Neurology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Neurol. 2001;58(1):149-151.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Cortical lesions in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A 2-year longitudinal MR study
Calabrese et al.
Neurology 2009;72:1330-1336.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gender-related differences in MS: a study of conventional and nonconventional MRI measures
Antulov et al.
Mult Scler 2009;15:345-354.
ABSTRACT
Large-scale, multicentre, quantitative MRI study of brain and cord damage in primary progressive multiple sclerosis
Rovaris et al.
Mult Scler 2008;14:455-464.
ABSTRACT
Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenesis and MR Imaging Features of T1 Hypointensities in Murine Model
Pirko et al.
Radiology 2008;246:790-795.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Voxel-Based Assessment of Differences in Damage and Distribution of White Matter Lesions Between Patients With Primary Progressive and Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Di Perri et al.
Arch Neurol 2008;65:236-243.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quantification of subtle blood-brain barrier disruption in non-enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis: a study of disease and lesion subtypes
Soon et al.
Mult Scler 2007;13:884-894.
ABSTRACT
Grey matter damage predicts the evolution of primary progressive multiple sclerosis at 5 years
Rovaris et al.
Brain 2006;129:2628-2634.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Multiple Sclerosis and Black Holes: Connecting the Pixels
Naismith and Cross
Arch Neurol 2005;62:1666-1668.
FULL TEXT
Current approved options for treating patients with multiple sclerosis
Rizvi and Agius
Neurology 2004;63:S8-S14.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Elevated white matter myo-inositol in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis
Fernando et al.
Brain 2004;127:1361-1369.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Imaging primary progressive multiple sclerosis: the contribution of structural, metabolic, and functional MRI techniques
Filippi et al.
Mult Scler 2004;10:S36-S45.
ABSTRACT
Imaging primary progressive multiple sclerosis: the contribution of structural, metabolic, and functional MRI techniques
Filippi et al.
Mult Scler 2004;10:S36-S45.
ABSTRACT
Progressive change in primary progressive multiple sclerosis normal-appearing white matter: a serial diffusion magnetic resonance imaging study
Schmierer et al.
Mult Scler 2004;10:182-187.
ABSTRACT
Primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a 5-year clinical and MR study
Ingle et al.
Brain 2003;126:2528-2536.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical presentation of primary progressive multiple sclerosis 10 years after the incidental finding of typical magnetic resonance imaging brain lesions: The subclinical stage of primary progressive multiple sclerosis may last 10 years
McDonnell et al.
Mult Scler 2003;9:204-209.
ABSTRACT
Acute axonal damage in multiple sclerosis is most extensive in early disease stages and decreases over time
Kuhlmann et al.
Brain 2002;125:2202-2212.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assessment of Normal-Appearing White and Gray Matter in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Diffusion-Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Rovaris et al.
Arch Neurol 2002;59:1406-1412.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
MRI aspects of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Wolinsky
Mult Scler 2002;8:85-87.
Glatiramer acetate reduces the proportion of new MS lesions evolving into "black holes"
Richert et al.
Neurology 2002;58:1440-1442.
FULL TEXT
MRI techniques to monitor MS evolution: The present and the future
Filippi and Grossman
Neurology 2002;58:1147-1153.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The pathology of primary progressive multiple sclerosis
Bruck et al.
Mult Scler 2002;8:93-97.
ABSTRACT
MRI aspects of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Wolinsky
Mult Scler 2002;8:85-87.
In vivo assessment of the brain and cervical cord pathology of patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis
Rovaris et al.
Brain 2001;124:2540-2549.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|