You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 4, April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Images in Neurology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Neuro-otology
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bilateral Facial Palsy in Neuroborreliosis

Georg Hagemann, MD; Ilia Mois Aroyo, MD

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(4):534-535.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

A 54-year-old forest worker experienced bilateral facial weakness. A few days later, he presented with an almost complete facial palsy without any disturbances of taste, hearing, or sensation. He had a marked Bell phenomenon (Figure). He was diagnosed some years before with Lyme disease without any clinical symptoms and was treated with oral antibiotics. Meanwhile, he received some new tick bites. A lumbar puncture revealed a lymphocyte count of 77/µL and an elevated protein level of 2.5 g/L. Serological testing revealed positive IgG results, a negative IgM borreliosis titer on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and multiple bands on Western blotting, suggestive of either remnants of an earlier asymptomatic contact with borrelia or a late or very recent infection with still-absent IgM antibodies. In cerebrospinal fluid, IgM antibodies were negative and the IgG antibody index was 1.4. Serological testing results for tick-borne . . . [Full Text of this Article]

COMMENT


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.