 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Convolutions of the Silent Sports Concussion: A Neuropsychologists Response to the Dark Ages of Rule-Based Return-to-Play Decisions—Reply
Lester Mayers, MD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In reply
I thank Dr Casson et al and Professor Edwards for their interest and appreciate their comments about my recent article,1 providing me with the opportunity to restate my position, hopefully with added clarity. Casson et al disagree with my conclusion advocating a postconcussion RTP interval of at least 4 weeks, stating that it "is flawed owing to a misinterpretation and misapplication of basic research results to the clinical sphere."
They add that I have "erroneously equated the clinical term alteration of mental status . . . with the broader nonspecific term cerebral dysfunction." In fact, my minireview concluded that clinical symptoms and signs clear before resolution of other measures of cerebral dysfunction. Certainly, the different studies I referenced demonstrating what their authors and I believe represent persisting cerebral dysfunction for up to 30 days after concussion did not measure altered mental status because mental status and standard . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Return-to-Play Criteria After Athletic Concussion: A Need for Revision
Lester Mayers
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1158-1161.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
National Football League Experiences With Return to Play After Concussion
Ira R. Casson, Elliot J. Pellman, and David C. Viano
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(3):419-420.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Convolutions of the Silent Sports Concussion: A Neuropsychologists Response to the Dark Ages of Rule-Based Return-to-Play Decisions
Ann B. Shuttleworth-Edwards
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(3):420-421.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|