 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Convolutions of the Silent Sports Concussion: A Neuropsychologists Response to the Dark Ages of Rule-Based Return-to-Play Decisions
Ann B. Shuttleworth-Edwards, PhD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The recent minireview by Dr Mayers1 lends compelling support to similar concerns expressed in the September 2008 edition of Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.2 At issue in both of these articles1-2 is the hazard of ignoring the possibility that there may be clinically "silent" consequences of a sports concussion with associated return-to-play (RTP) risks. Dr Mayers recommends an extended 4- to 6-week postconcussion RTP interval in place of the commonly used 1- to 2-week interval as an imperative protective measure against this risk. However, it is hardly necessary to point out that such a blanket 4- to 6-week rule may cause some athletes to be kept out of sports longer than necessary, while at the same time there can be no guarantee that every athlete will be recovered after 4 to 6 weeks. In this respect, Dr Mayers actually states that few of the researchers he . . . [Full Text of this Article]AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Return-to-Play Criteria After Athletic Concussion: A Need for Revision
Lester Mayers
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1158-1161.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
National Football League Experiences With Return to Play After Concussion
Ira R. Casson, Elliot J. Pellman, and David C. Viano
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(3):419-420.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Convolutions of the Silent Sports Concussion: A Neuropsychologists Response to the Dark Ages of Rule-Based Return-to-Play Decisions—Reply
Lester Mayers
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(3):421.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|