You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 3, March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Thrombolysis, Fluctuations, and Protocol Expansions

Abraham Totah, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article by Ozdemir et al1 sheds light on important questions with which we struggle in treating patients with ischemic stroke. The administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) according to standard protocols frequently excludes patients who might benefit from such treatment. It is estimated that only 3% to 8% of eligible patients with ischemic stroke receive rtPA.2 Studies that expand the use of rtPA hold promise for increasing that percentage.

All of the patients studied by Ozdemir and colleagues were treated within the therapeutic time window of intravenous or intra-arterial rtPA administration. Violating the therapeutic time window in patients with fluctuating symptoms has not been discussed. As an example of such a situation, I would like to share the following case.

A 60-year-old woman had a recurrent small-vessel syndrome with complete right hemiplegia and dysarthria. The deficit resolved on presentation but recurred 3 times in the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Thrombolysis in Patients With Marked Clinical Fluctuations in Neurologic Status Due to Cerebral Ischemia
Ozcan Ozdemir, Vadim Beletsky, Richard Chan, and Vladimir Hachinski
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1041-1043.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Thrombolysis, Fluctuations, and Protocol Expansions—Reply
Ozcan Ozdemir, Vadim Beletsky, Richard Chan, and Vladimir Hachinski
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(3):418-419.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.