 |
 |

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Percutaneous Clot Removal in Acute Ischemic Stroke—Reply
Wyatt W. Decker, MD;
Latha G. Stead, MD;
M. Fernanda Bellolio, MD;
Rachel M. Gilmore, MBBCh;
Alejandro A. Rabinstein, MD
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In reply
We wish to thank Drs Mandava and Kent for their comments on our recently published article. They express several concerns about the findings of the systematic review.
Their first concern regards the use of case reports and case series in this systematic review. We agree that there are limitations of this study and are explicit in our article, outlining that of the 114 articles identified, 91 were excluded as they did not contain any original cases or data. Of the 23 articles that remained, 1 was excluded as it also lacked patient data. Finally, of the remaining articles, 14 case series and 8 case reports were identified and used for this analysis.
Their second concern is that of variability in outcome and follow-up. We acknowledge that this is . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Percutaneous Clot Removal Devices in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Latha G. Stead, Rachel M. Gilmore, M. Fernanda Bellolio, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, and Wyatt W. Decker
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1024-1030.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Percutaneous Clot Removal in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Pitchaiah Mandava and Thomas A. Kent
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(2):283-284.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|