You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 11, November 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Neurology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Epilepsy
 •Pediatric Neurology
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Cost of Gullibility

E. S. Roach, MD

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(11):1418-1420.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.
Oscar Wilde

When the price of eggs rose to unprecedented levels in 1966, President Lyndon B. Johnson ordered his surgeon general to decrease demand by warning his fellow Americans of the health hazards of egg consumption. The evidence against the lowly egg was at best shaky, and recent studies suggest that the health risks from eggs, if any, were greatly exaggerated. Nevertheless, millions of health-conscious Americans dutifully altered their diets, secure in their belief that eggs must be bad for one's health. Are we physicians so gullible and easily manipulated that we could possibly fall for such an arrogant ploy? Evidently, because most physicians of the day accepted the marginal idea that eggs are worse than other foods with the same lack of skepticism that many neurologists today display toward the notion that generic . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

The Value of Specifying Brand-name Antiepileptic Drugs
Yu-tze Ng
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(11):1415-1416.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Generic Anticonvulsant Use in Children: Do We Have Evidence to Recommend Brand Formulations?
Lorie D. Hamiwka
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(11):1417-1418.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.