You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 65 No. 9, September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bridging Anticoagulation After Cardioembolic Stroke

Robert J. Wityk, MD

Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1157.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Long-term anticoagulation with warfarin is accepted as an effective means of stroke prevention in patients with ischemic stroke due to a high-risk cardiac embolic source, such as cardiac thrombus, prosthetic heart valves, and many patients with atrial fibrillation. The acute management of these patients in terms of the timing and manner of anticoagulation after presentation with cardioembolic stroke is not as clear.

Proponents of early anticoagulation point to the risk of early recurrent stroke from repeat embolization. In the 1980s, the risk of recurrent embolism was felt to be as high as 10% to 20% within the first 2 weeks after ischemic stroke.1 The Cerebral Embolism Study Group2 reported a randomized trial of immediate anticoagulation with intravenous heparin within 48 hours of stroke onset vs no anticoagulation. (Antiplatelet agents were not allowed in the study.) The study was ended prematurely after only 45 patients because of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Anticoagulation After Cardioembolic Stroke: To Bridge or Not to Bridge?
Hen Hallevi, Karen C. Albright, Sheryl Martin-Schild, Andrew D. Barreto, Sean I. Savitz, Miguel A. Escobar, Nicole R. Gonzales, Elizabeth A. Noser, Kachi Illoh, and James C. Grotta
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1169-1173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

This Month in Archives of Neurology
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(9):1152-1153.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Heparin or Enoxaparin Bridging for Cardioembolic-Stroke Patients
JWatch General 2008;2008:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.