You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 65 No. 6, June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Neurology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Epilepsy
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Surgery
 •Neurosurgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evidence-Based Practice

A Reevaluation of the Intracarotid Amobarbital Procedure (Wada Test)

Sallie A. Baxendale, PhD; Pamela J. Thompson, PhD; John S. Duncan, FRCP

Arch Neurol. 2008;65(6):841-845.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The IAP, or Wada test, was originally designed as a method to allow unilateral electroconvulsive shock therapy for psychosis. The method soon proved valuable as a tool for language lateralization1 and was used as a screening tool for temporal lobectomy candidates following Penfield and Milner's study2 of patients who became amnesic following a unilateral temporal lobectomy in the 1950s. Because there were no other reliable ways of evaluating the form and function of the contralateral structures prior to surgery, the IAP quickly became established as an essential presurgical investigation to screen for amnesic risk. More recently, data from the IAP has been used for a variety of other purposes within the epilepsy surgery setting. This article examines the role of the IAP in each of these domains, with reference to the historical context of the procedure, advances in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

SCREENING FOR AMNESIC RISK

TRUE-POSITIVES

FALSE-POSITIVES

FALSE-NEGATIVES

BILATERAL ABNORMALITIES

LANGUAGE LATERALIZATION

LATERALIZATION OF SEIZURE FOCUS

PREDICTION OF POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOME


CONCLUSIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, London, England.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Verbal memory in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: beyond material specificity
Saling
Brain 2009;132:570-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Localizing Cortical Function Is Occasionally Impossible
Roach
Arch Neurol 2008;65:845-846.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.