 |
 |

Questioning Botulinum Toxin for HeadacheReality or Illusion
E. S. Roach, MD
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):151-152.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.—Albert Einstein
Since the first anecdotal reports1 of headache improvement in individuals receiving botulinum injections for facial wrinkles, several controlled and uncontrolled trials of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) in headache patients have been published. These studies have yielded generally disappointing and conflicting results, and there continues to be controversy about the usefulness of BoNT in individuals with headache. In this "Controversies in Neurology," Ashkenazi and Silberstein2 argue that BoNT is a safe and effective headache treatment for some individuals with episodic or chronic migraine while Pakalnis and Couch3 believe that the available randomized clinical trials provide little evidence that botulinum injections benefit individuals with either migraine or tension headache. Although Pakalnis and Couch acknowledge that a small subset of headache patients might benefit from BoNT therapy, there is presently no way to identify these individuals short of . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliations: Division of Child Neurology, Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus.
RELATED ARTICLES
Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Headache: Why We Say Yes
Avi Ashkenazi and Stephen Silberstein
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):146-149.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Headache Therapy With Botulinum Toxin: Form Over Substance
Ann Pakalnis and James Couch
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):149-151.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|