You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 64 No. 6, June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Neurology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Diagnosis
 •Multiple Sclerosis/ Demyelinating Disease
 •Neuro-ophthalmology
 •Neurology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Neuromyelitis Optica Is Distinct From Multiple Sclerosis

Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, FRCP(C)

Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):899-901.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The definition of multiple sclerosis (MS) is based on a single principle: lesions in the central nervous system disseminated in time and space, subject to the caveat that the syndromes used to define the lesions are typical of MS as recognized by a health care professional familiar with that diagnosis. Although a series of iterations of these diagnostic criteria have succeeded one another, there has been no fundamental change in that overriding principle. Many neurological conditions, including metabolic, inflammatory, and vascular diseases, lead to multifocal and relapsing manifestations. Accordingly, and considering the nonspecific symptoms that may occur in MS, many diseases masquerade as and are misdiagnosed as MS. Even when "lesions" are restricted to syndromes characteristic of MS, such as optic neuritis and myelitis, their associated disease states may be more appropriately classified as idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases distinct from MS.1 Such disorders include acute . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliation: Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.


RELATED LETTERS

More on Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica
Diego Franciotta, Sven Jarius, and Francesca Aloisi
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(12):1802.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

More on Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica—Reply
Brian Weinshenker, Steve Galetta, Jeffrey Bennett, Douglas Kerr, and Elliot M. Frohman
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(12):1802-1803.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Neuromyelitis Optica Is a Variant of Multiple Sclerosis
Steven L. Galetta and Jeffrey Bennett
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):901-903.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Neuromyelitis Optica Distinct From Multiple Sclerosis?: Something for "Lumpers" and "Splitters"
Elliot M. Frohman and Douglas Kerr
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):903-905.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Neuromyelitis Optica a Distinct Entity?
E. S. Roach
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):906.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome
Mehta et al.
Mult Scler 2008;14:425-427.
ABSTRACT  

More on Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica
Franciotta et al.
Arch Neurol 2007;64:1802-1802.
FULL TEXT  

More on Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Reply
Weinshenker et al.
Arch Neurol 2007;64:1802-1803.
FULL TEXT  

Is Neuromyelitis Optica Distinct From Multiple Sclerosis?: Something for "Lumpers" and "Splitters"
Frohman and Kerr
Arch Neurol 2007;64:903-905.
FULL TEXT  

Is Neuromyelitis Optica a Distinct Entity?
Roach
Arch Neurol 2007;64:906-906.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.