This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cerebrovascular Disease  • Stroke  • Neurology, Other  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The timely review¹ regarding tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use for acute stroke implies that some physicians' reluctance to prescribe tPA is attributable to their unjustified fear of cerebral hemorrhage for patients and litigation and poor pay for themselves. Because the reviewers' earnest premise is that tPA "increases recovery from stroke symptoms by up to 50% with a low serious complication rate," they imply that choice should be certain. But a fourth factor to consider is that equally conscientious evaluation of the complex database by professional colleagues may be less enthusiastic.

The original 1995 reference² states that at 3 months, not earlier,

As compared with the placebo group, there was a 12% absolute (32% relative) increase in the number of patients with minimal or no disability (a score of 95 or 100 on the Barthel index) in the tPA group. There was also an 11% absolute (55% relative) increase in the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Nonstroke Treatment—Reply
Kara Z. Bambauer, S. Claiborne Johnston, Derek E. Bambauer, and Justin A. Zivin
Arch Neurol. 2006;63(10):1506-1507.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reasons Why Few Patients With Acute Stroke Receive Tissue Plasminogen Activator
Kara Z. Bambauer, S. Claiborne Johnston, Derek E. Bambauer, and Justin A. Zivin
Arch Neurol. 2006;63(5):661-664.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT