You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies in Neurology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Epilepsy
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Epilepsy

Cause for Concern

Phillip L. Pearl, MD; Emily L. Robbins; Heather D. Bennett, BA; Joan A. Conry, MD

Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1472-1475.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The use of complementary and alternative medication (CAM) in the United States has skyrocketed in the past decade. One does not have to search obscure or dated editions of the lay press to discover evidence of this trend in the healing arts.1 The medical community has an obligation to respond to this trend in an evidence-based and constructive manner. The position of the Epilepsy Foundation (Landover, Md) is that alternative therapies are acceptable as long as the patient continues with the traditional therapies, and the alternative and traditional therapies do not conflict.2 While this position appears reasonable, its premise depends on the presence of evidence for efficacy of alternative therapies in the treatment of seizures and acceptable safety without excessive toxic side effects. This standard applies to all therapies in medicine and should not be . . . [Full Text of this Article]

WHAT IS THE STATUS OF CAM IN THE TREATMENT OF EPILEPSY?


WHAT ARE THE DATA FOR EFFICACY AGAINST SEIZURES?

WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF SUCH THERAPIES?

WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR POTENTIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN ALTERNATIVE AND TRADITIONAL THERAPY?

CONCLUSIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC.


RELATED ARTICLES

Role for Complementary and Alternative Treatments in Epilepsy
Joseph Scheller
Arch Neurol. 2005;62(9):1471-1472.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Complementary and Alternative Therapy for Epilepsy: Much Less Than Meets the Eye
E. S. Roach
Arch Neurol. 2005;62(9):1475-1476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Complementary and Alternative Therapy for Epilepsy: Much Less Than Meets the Eye
Roach
Arch Neurol 2005;62:1475-1476.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.