You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 6, June 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Multiple Sclerosis/ Demyelinating Disease
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glatiramer Acetate Therapy: The Plot Thickens

Arch Neurol. 2005;62:858-859.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone; Teva Pharmaceuticals, North Wales, Pa) is a random polymer of glutamic acid, lysine, alanine, and tyrosine, and is of considerable interest for its ability to reduce the frequency of relapses in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS).1 Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain these findings. Lando et al2 suggested that inhibition of clinical disease in an animal model of MS, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, was due to suppressor cells because protection could be adoptively transferred from glatiramer acetate–treated mice. Early studies suggested that glatiramer acetate could inhibit antigen-specific responses through competition for major histocompatibility complex molecules.3 More recent work suggests that glatiramer acetate treatment of MS patients and mice with experimental autoimmune encephalitis has several potential mechanisms, although the favored one seems to be of inducing a shift in the balance of Th1 and Th2 cells.4-5 However, the exact T-cell populations responsible for these shifts were not characterized immunophenotypically . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Nitin J. Karandikar, MD, PhD; Michael K. Racke, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Bystander Modulation of Chemokine Receptor Expression on Peripheral Blood T Lymphocytes Mediated by Glatiramer Therapy
Rameeza Allie, Lina Hu, Katherine M. Mullen, Suhayl Dhib-Jalbut, and Peter A. Calabresi
Arch Neurol. 2005;62(6):889-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.