You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 10, October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Deep Brain Stimulation
 •Movement Disorders
 •Parkinson Disease/ Parkinsonian Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Multisite Randomized Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We would like to thank Dr Follett and his colleagues and Drs Minguez-Castellanos and Escamilla-Sevilla for their recent letters in response to our editorial, "Subthalamic nucleus vs globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation, the rematch."1 We are in complete agreement with these authors on the 2 points from the editorial that they have highlighted. First, there is a "need for further research to establish the long-term benefits and potential risks of these treatment approaches." And second, we should endeavor to match individual patient needs with the strengths and weaknesses of individual targets.1 Given that both targets have proven clinically effective, research efforts should be directed toward the identification of patient subgroups to whom one or the other approach may be more suited. We would like to briefly comment on each of these 2 important topics.

In their letter to the editor, Dr Follett and colleagues report on the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Michael S. Okun, MD; Kelly D. Foote, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Multisite Randomized Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation
Kenneth Follett, Frances Weaver, Matthew Stern, William Marks, Penelope Hogarth, Katherine Holloway, Jeff Bronstein, John Duda, Stacy Horn, Eugene Lai, and Ali Samii
Arch Neurol. 2005;62(10):1643-1644.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subthalamic Nucleus vs Globus Pallidus Interna Deep Brain Stimulation, the Rematch: Will Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation Make a Triumphant Return?
Michael S. Okun and Kelly D. Foote
Arch Neurol. 2005;62(4):533-536.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pallidal vs Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease
Valerie C. Anderson, Kim J. Burchiel, Penelope Hogarth, Jacques Favre, and John P. Hammerstad
Arch Neurol. 2005;62(4):554-560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.